Due Process Organization Blasts Colleges Over Disturbing Trends in Sexual Misconduct Policies

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Dec 30, 2019 | 0 Comments

An advocacy organization for individual rights on college campuses has issued a scathing report on due process rights in Title IX cases across the country. The report claims that nearly all college campuses fail to provide students who have been accused of sexual misconduct the due process that the U.S. Constitution guarantees them.

Report Blasts Higher Education for Lack of Due Process in Title IX Cases

The report was issued by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) and is the second time the organization has released such a survey.

In it, the organization looks at the written misconduct policies used by 53 different colleges across the country. In some cases, schools used different misconduct policies for academic or disciplinary misconduct, on the one hand, and sexual misconduct, on the other. Important factors that FIRE looked for in these policies included:

  • An explicit presumption of innocence for the accused
  • The right to meaningfully cross-examine the accuser
  • A right to appeal the outcome of a case
  • A requirement that the fact-finders in a case be impartial
  • Time for the accused student to prepare for the case with the evidence that will be used against them

In all, there were 20 points that could be awarded to each school, based on how well it satisfied the factors that FIRE considered important for due process. No school earned a score of 12 or higher for their sexual misconduct policies.

Some Truly Disturbing Results in the Report

There are a lot of things to worry about in the report. However, some of the results stand out more than others. Some of the most alarming results included:

  • 72% of the schools in the survey did not explicitly state that accused students were presumed innocent until proven guilty
  • A mere 6% of schools require either a unanimous decision by the fact-finding panel or “clear and convincing evidence” before expelling a student for sexual misconduct
  • Under 10% of schools allowed accused students to cross-examine their accuser
  • Only 40% of schools let accused students challenge their fact-finders' bias or partiality

To make matters worse, the due process rights and safeguards seemed to evaporate in allegations of sexual misconduct when the school maintained separate policies. While the average score given by FIRE was 7.23 for non-sexual misconduct policies, it fell to 5.49 for cases that fell under the school's sexual misconduct policy.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

The findings in FIRE's report on due process in college misconduct investigations are not surprising. Students who have been accused of sexual misconduct everywhere have faced a difficult time having their side of the story heard and taken seriously.

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and national Title IX advisor who can help students defend against an allegation of sexual misconduct. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686 if you have been accused of sexual misconduct and want to raise a vigorous defense. Your education and your professional future can count on it.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.