OCR to Investigate School's Title IX Office After Harassment Complaint Based Solely on Hearsay

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jul 08, 2019 | 0 Comments

There have been new developments in a Title IX claim of sexual misconduct from Webster University. As we recounted in our blog back in May, those Title IX claims are based on hearsay – a student heard from friends that one of her professors said she was flirting with him.

The school has since denied her Title IX claim and the Office for Civil Rights at the Department of Education (OCR) has gotten involved.

Student Files Title IX Claim After Hearing About Professor's Remarks

The case involves a private St. Louis college, Webster University. A student there learned from friends that one of her professors was telling others that she was flirting with him, so she filed a Title IX lawsuit against him and the school.

While the school's Title IX office claims that it intends to finish investigations within 60 days, this one was still ongoing more than a year later when the student graduated. At that point, the school's Title IX office said that it was only halfway finished with their investigation.

School Denies Title IX Claims, OCR Announces Investigation

Soon after the student went public with her allegations and local media started paying attention to how long the Title IX claims were taking, the school abruptly finished the last half of its investigation and notified the student that there had been no misconduct on the professor's part. The school pointed to its Title IX rules and procedures, which said nothing about alleged sexual comments made to someone other than the student. The school also said that the alleged harassment did not interfere with the student's education.

Soon thereafter, the student was contacted by the Office for Civil Rights. They told her that they were planning to investigate Webster University's Title IX rules, officially opening the investigation later that day.

Internal Audit Leads to Title IX Changes

Meanwhile, Webster University has conducted an internal audit of its Title IX procedures. This audit found “several areas where improvements could be made,” and led to changes by the school.

The Problem With Letting Schools Run Title IX Investigations

These allegations highlight one of the most pressing problems that Title IX law has created: Each school can create its own rules and regulations for investigating and hearing claims of sexual misconduct and other Title IX allegations.

It should come as no surprise that some schools come up with procedures that tilt the scales in favor of the accused or the accuser or, as in the case of Webster University, create a Title IX investigation system that takes over a year to resolve a case.

In theory, this is where the OCR and the court system are supposed to come into play. The OCR's input and court rulings are supposed to give schools the input they need to create Title IX regulations that follow the law.

In practice, though, this creates an ad hoc system that handles similar cases very differently, depending on where it happened.

Joseph D. Lento: Title IX Advisor and Defense Lawyer

Joseph D. Lento is a national Title IX advisor and defense attorney. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686 for help.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges locally and nationwide while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.