Title IX Rule Change Could Reduce School's Off-Campus Reach

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Feb 21, 2019 | 0 Comments

The Department of Education is in the process of altering how the edicts of Title IX are enforced in colleges across the country. One of the details encapsulated in the rule changes that are currently working their way through the political system would alter a college's jurisdiction to hear allegations of sexual misconduct.

Title IX defense lawyer Joseph D. Lento is watching the progress of the proposed rule amendments very closely.

Proposed Rule Changes Would Impact Title IX

The proposed rule amendments would change an important regulation in Title IX's enforcement structure – the Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex in Education Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance regulation. The rule changes have sparked criticism at nearly every point in the process: The public comment period attracted over 100,000 comments that showcased the competing interests at the heart of Title IX, in spite of the fact that site complications shut down the comment portal preemptively. Then, the Federal Register reopened the comment window to make up for the day that the site was down, but only announced the decision at the last moment.

A Crucial Detail of the Amendments Alters a School's Title IX Jurisdiction

One of the most important details embedded in the rule changes would alter a school's Title IX jurisdiction over allegations of sexual misconduct.

Currently, the regulations surrounding Title IX instruct colleges to take vigorous action whenever an instance of sexual misconduct would disrupt a student's education, even if the alleged incident happened off campus.

The proposed change to the nondiscrimination regulation, though, would only require colleges to address sexual misconduct allegations if they happened in the school's “programs or activities.” Most of the incidents that happened off campus, then, would fall outside of the school's jurisdiction.

Drafting Issue Sparks Confusion

However, the language used in the rule amendments has sparked uncertainty: There are conflicting passages in the proposed rules that make it unclear if the amendments would mean that a school cannot enforce Title IX's requirements for off-campus incidents, or if the school has the discretion to enforce Title IX's requirements. The difference is significant – many schools have expressed an interest in being able to pursue Title IX investigations for allegations of incidents that happened off campus in order to protect students from sexual misconduct. If they were not able to exercise Title IX jurisdiction over these allegations, then claimants would have to go to the police, instead.

National Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

As we will discuss in the next few blog posts, this rule change could be a game-changer for many Title IX cases in the future. Not only is there a huge difference in the burden of proof for sexual misconduct allegations that go through the criminal system, as opposed to the Title IX process, there would also be significant differences in how many cases get reported to law enforcement. Together, these amendments would be good news for those who get wrongly accused of sexual misconduct by college students.

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer who represents students accused of sexual misconduct. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.