Blog

New 9th Circuit Case Emphasizes Students’ Due Process Rights

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 08, 2025 | 0 Comments

A March 2025 federal appeals court decision highlights the importance of due process rights for students accused of misconduct. In the case of K.J. by & through Johnson v. Jackson, 127 F.4th 1239 (9th Cir. 2025), the court ruled that the school had violated the due process rights of a student who faced multiple disciplinary charges. Initially, the student was suspended for fighting, but the school extended the suspension due to an additional charge without providing further notice. This ruling underscores the critical need for due process in all student discipline matters, including those related to Title IX.

If you or your student faces school discipline, call the Lento Law Firm. We represent students accused of misconduct, including Title IX, nationwide. Call (888) 535-3686 or leave your details online, and we will contact you.

K.J. by and through Johnson v. Jackson Decision

The K.J. by and through Johnson v. Jackson decision came from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals after the trial court had effectively dismissed the suit. The student who filed the lawsuit had been suspended for fighting and had begun serving the suspension. The school extended the suspension on an additional charge of “causing injury to another person” without telling the student or giving him the opportunity to respond. The student sued the school for violating his due process rights. The trial court granted summary judgment, which means they threw the case out before hearing the merits.

The Ninth Circuit Court reversed, finding that the school had violated the students' due process rights to notice and the chance to respond to the second charge. The court also found that the notice to the student's parents was not sufficient to meet due process: the student himself must be given notice and an opportunity to respond and fight charges. The Ninth Circuit ruled that the student could seek both money damages and record expungement as remedies for the due process violation.

Why This Decision Is Important

The K.J. decision is important because it emphasizes the due process rights of students fighting all types of charges. These due process rights include notice and a meaningful opportunity to respond. This decision means that schools cannot add multiple charges or change the nature of existing charges without notice and hearing rights. Additionally, the due process rights belong to the student, and notice to the parents (according to the Ninth Circuit) is inadequate. Finally, the decision makes it clear that sovereign immunity (immunity of government, including public schools) does not prevent expungement of records in disciplinary cases. This means a student who has been disciplined can seek reversal of the discipline and removal of the record from his file.

If Your Due Process Rights Were Violated

If your due process rights were violated in a school discipline case, including a Title IX proceeding, the Lento Law Firm Student Defense Team can help. We are a premier student discipline defense firm representing students nationwide. We believe in our students' right to due process and have a proven track record of fighting for these rights. Call the Lento Law Firm at (888) 535-3686 to arrange a confidential consultation or leave your details online, and we will contact you.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu