NBME/USMLE Defense for District of Columbia Medical Students and Graduates

The District of Columbia needs physicians. District data indicates that the District has physician shortages in several areas, making for solid employment opportunities and a needful patient base. The District's large population, generally strong public and service economies, and culture, entertainment, and arts add to the attractions of local medical practice. The District of Columbia Board of Medicine accordingly invites online applications for a medical license. You must, though, favorably resolve your NBME/USMLE medical licensing exam issues to qualify for a District license. When seeking help, avoid unqualified local representation. Call 888.535.3686 or use our contact form now to retain the Lento Law Firm's premier Student Defense Team for the skilled and experienced attorneys you need to resolve your medical licensing exam issues. We are available across the District of Columbia. Get our help so that you can get started in your District of Columbia medical practice.

District of Columbia Medical Practice Support

The District of Columbia has the professional facilities and resources you need to build a thriving medical practice. The District's premier hospitals and healthcare facilities include MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Children's National Hospital, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, the George Washington University Hospital, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Howard University Hospital, MedStar National Rehabilitation Hospital, United Medical Center, Bridgepoint Continuing Care Hospital - Capitol Hill, and Bridgepoint Continuing Care Hospital - National Harborside. District of Columbia medical schools, including George Washington University School of Medicine, Georgetown University School of Medicine, and Howard University College of Medicine, offer abundant teaching, research, continuing education, and networking opportunities. The Medical Society of the District of Columbia promotes medical practices across the District. We can help you get started in your District of Columbia medical practice to pursue the District's many rewarding opportunities.

District of Columbia Medical Licensing Authority

The District of Columbia Board of Medicine holds the District's authority to license and regulate medical practice within the District. You must satisfy the Board of Medicine that you qualify for a medical license if you intend to practice medicine within the District. District of Columbia Code Section 3-1205.01 requires that any individual practicing medicine in the District must hold a Board of Medicine license. Section 3-1210.01 reinforces that unlicensed medical practice is unlawful. Section 3-1210.07 defines unlicensed medical practice as a crime punishable by up to a year in jail and a $10,000 fine, with a second offense raising the fine to $25,000. District of Columbia Code Section 3-1205.16 authorizes the Board of Medicine to issue a cease and desist order against any individual practicing medicine without a license, enforceable by court order and contempt sanction. Practicing without a license could bar you from obtaining a license later in the District or elsewhere. Don't face these risks. Instead, get our help resolving your medical licensing exam issues for a District of Columbia medical license.

District of Columbia License Application Requirements

District of Columbia Code Section 3-1205.05 requires that you apply to the Board of Medicine using the Board's required forms for your District of Columbia medical license. Section 3-1205.05 also requires you to pay the fee and provide all requested information and documentation while retaining the burden of proving that you meet all licensing requirements. District of Columbia Board of Medicine administrative rules confirm and extend these application requirements. The burden of proof means that the Board of Medicine may deny your license application if you fail to provide all required information and documentation in the form the Board specifies. It's on you. Moreover, if your information and documentation are inaccurate or inconsistent, the Board may conclude that you deliberately attempted to deceive the Board that you meet license requirements, thus denying you a license based on your presumed credential fraud. Take special care in disclosing your USMLE issues so that you do not end up losing the opportunity to get a license to credential fraud charges. Let us help you update and correct your application to accurately and fully disclose those issues.

District of Columbia Medical Board General Requirements

District of Columbia Code Section 3-1205.03 states the general requirements for medical licensure. Those requirements include proof that you have not committed a crime related to medical practice, are at least age eighteen, have completed an approved medical school program, have passed an approved medical licensing exam, and have not lost a medical license in another jurisdiction. Section 3-1205.04 repeats the medical school graduation requirement while adding a requirement of one year of postgraduate medical residency. Board of Medicine Rule 4602.3 requires that the medical school be LCME approved. Indications of your incompetence or unprofessionalism in medical practice, intemperance as to alcohol, substance addiction as to drugs, or mental or physical impairment may lead to further evaluation and denial of your license application. Let us help you resolve issues as to any of these general requirements, while also addressing your medical licensing exam issues.

District of Columbia Medical Board Licensing Exam Requirements

As just shown above, District of Columbia Code Section 3-1205.03, stating the general requirements for medical licensure, requires that you pass a medical licensing exam without specifying the exam. Instead, District of Columbia Code Section 3-1205.06 authorizes the Board of Medicine to specify the exam. The Board of Medicine does so in its Rule 4605, approving the NBME, USMLE, and FLEX, or certain combinations of those exams. Rule 4605 adds related exam requirements. For instance, Rule 4605 limits FLEX attempts to three on each part and limits USMLE Step 3 exam attempts to three. The latter USMLE Step 3 exam limit is lower than the USMLE's own four attempts limit. Let us help you determine if your medical licensing exam pathway meets or can meet these District of Columbia Board of Medicine requirements, or if not, we can obtain a Board of Medicine waiver to allow you to satisfy the licensing requirement following your own pathway.

District of Columbia Medical Licensing Exam Issues

The above District of Columbia medical licensing statutes and District of Columbia Board of Medicine administrative rules have the design to protect patients from unqualified medical care. But now that those requirements have tripped you up over medical licensing exam issues, you are surely frustrated with them when you know you have the medical education and skills to provide safe and effective medical care. Indeed, you are surely not just frustrated but rightly concerned that you may find yourself unable to practice medicine despite your enormous investment. We respect your concern and have the skills and experience to address and resolve it. The following sections show how we may be able to do so on the following common medical licensing exam issues:

  • your inability to qualify for the exam;
  • your exhausting exam attempt limits;
  • extenuating circumstances frustrating your exam attempt;
  • your facing exam cheating allegations;
  • your anomalous exam performance disqualification; or
  • you are facing an invalidated exam score.

District of Columbia Licensing Exam Qualification Issues

Challenges qualifying for the USMLE are common, especially insofar as exam qualification takes more effort and care than many applicants think. USMLE officials may look just as closely at your exam application as District of Columbia Board of Medicine officials look at your license application. The USMLE and the Board of Medicine, to some degree, work hand in hand to ensure patient protection from unqualified medical care. The Board of Medicine clearly relies on the licensing exam organizations for the integrity of their exams. The USMLE's Bulletin of Information states the requirements for USMLE exam qualification. Don't give short shrift to your USMLE application form, lest your application indicate such inaccuracies and inconsistencies as to trigger credential fraud charges. Here are some common issues applicants face in qualifying for the USMLE or other approved medical licensing exam:

  • statements don't match documentation;
  • unauthenticated, missing, or incomplete documentation;
  • records show medical school unsatisfactory academic progress;
  • records show medical school misconduct discipline;
  • records show unresolved medical school academic issues;
  • records show unresolved medical school disciplinary charges;
  • medical school accreditation issues during your enrollment;
  • records show medical residency termination or nonrenewal;
  • records show medical residency misconduct;
  • criminal conviction or domestic restraining order disqualify;
  • records suggest mental or physical impairment;
  • records suggest substance abuse, dependency, or addiction;
  • inadequate photographic identification; or
  • citizenship or lawful immigration status documentation inadequate.

How We Address Exam Qualification Issues

As to documentation issues, medical school registrars, residency directors, agency and court clerks, and other recordkeepers usually sit up and take notice when our attorneys appear on an applicant's behalf requesting updated, corrected, or authenticated records. If, instead, your problem is with unresolved issues, we can invoke the appropriate dispute resolution procedures in your medical school or medical residency. We can also work with the courts and immigration officials to resolve issues, all while communicating with the District of Columbia Board of Medicine to keep your license application alive.

District of Columbia Medical Licensing Exam Attempt Limits

Medical students and graduates fail USMLE step exams as they make strategic judgments about how much time and effort they need to devote to exam preparation. The USMLE's four attempts limit for each of its three step exams is usually enough for even the least prepared and most strategic examinee to pass. But as briefly mentioned above, the District of Columbia Board of Medicine in its Rule 4605 limits Step 3 exam attempts to three, one fewer than the USMLE four-attempts limit. If you fail any USMLE step exam four times, the USMLE may bar you from a fifth attempt instead of enforcing its four-attempts limit. The USMLE may likewise bar you from a fourth Step 3 exam attempt if it is determined to enforce the District of Columbia Board of Medicine three-attempts limit. Notice to the Board of Medicine of your failure and disqualification may result in prompt denial of your license application. Exhausting attempt limits in this manner is a common and daunting issue, threatening a candidate's licensure.

How We Address Exam Attempt Limits

Our attorneys may have several approaches available to them to address your issue with exhausting exam attempt limits. First, the USMLE offers an extenuating circumstances policy under which you may qualify for an extra attempt if an emergency circumstance kept you from beginning or finishing a scheduled exam, counting as an attempt against your limit. Your sudden, serious illness, accident, injury, or a similar event occurring to a dependent family member may excuse your unavailing attempt, giving you a retake. You must promptly notify USMLE officials and supply convincing explanations and documentation. We can help you do so. Alternatively, the District of Columbia Board of Medicine Rule 4605.12 authorizes an extra USMLE Step 3 exam attempt after your third Step 3 failure if you complete another year of residency. We may be able to convince Board officials that your interrupted attempt should not count, in effect applying the USMLE's extenuating circumstances policy, or that the Board should shorten or waive the extra year of residency requirement.

District of Columbia Licensing Exam Irregular Behavior Issues

Cheating allegations, or what the USMLE euphemistically labels irregular behavior, are another common medical licensing exam issue. Cheating allegations can come from anywhere, including not just exam proctors and test center staff but also other examinees with whom you study or take the exam. The allegations may be mistaken, false, exaggerated, or retaliatory. However, USMLE officials may still apply the organization's irregular behaviorpolicy to disqualify you from further attempts at the exam. USMLE officials may put the onus on you to respond to your disqualification. When District of Columbia Board of Medicine officials learn of your disqualification for alleged cheating, they would likely reject your license application. The USMLE Bulletin of Information lists these and other examples of cheating:

  • examinees soliciting or sharing confidential exam questions when preparing for an exam;
  • examinees share confidential exam questions after an exam to assist one another in preparation for a future exam;
  • an impostor taking your exam or you taking another's exam as an impostor;
  • examinees seeking, accepting, or offering assistance to one another during an exam;
  • bringing or using unauthorized materials or devices in the exam room;
  • removing exam materials from the exam room;
  • memorizing, recording, or reproducing exam questions during the exam for distribution after the exam;
  • disobeying or obstructing exam proctors or failing to cooperate with the cheating investigation;
  • claiming exam passage after exam failure, claiming exam qualification when not qualified, or exam registration when ineligible.

How We Address Irregular Behavior Charges

We address irregular behavior charges through the USMLE Office of the Secretariat's adjudication process. That process enables us to assemble and present your exonerating information and evidence to a USMLE official or panel while challenging the cheating allegations and any incriminating evidence. We may be able to use your testimony, the testimony of other witnesses, and our forensic consultants' analysis of handwriting, computers, and documents to prove your innocence. Our presentation of your character evidence and strong academic skills may further counteract inferences that your actions further your intent to gain an undue exam advantage. We would also keep District of Columbia Board of Medicine officials informed of our diligent defense on your behalf to keep your license application active.

District of Columbia Anomalous Exam Performance Issues

The USMLE's anomalous performance policy further authorizes exam officials to disqualify examinees whose exam performance was so poor as to suggest a basic lack of medical education or a nefarious exam attempt intended to gain access to confidential exam questions or help other examinees cheat during the exam. USMLE officials analyze answer patterns, not just very low scores, for obviously inappropriate responses, like all the same answer options throughout or skipping whole sections, reflecting not just an unavailing attempt but a dishonest attempt. Disqualification for anomalous performance may result in a District of Columbia Board of Medicine license application rejection, prohibiting you from obtaining a license to start permanent practice.

How We Address Anomalous Exam Performance

The USMLE does not publicize a formal adjudication process through which to challenge disqualification for anomalous performance. Instead, our attorneys would work to open informal channels with USMLE officials to present your explanation and exonerating evidence. You may, for instance, have suffered a sudden illness, injury, or medical or mental event during the exam that kept you from making an earnest and complete attempt. You may alternatively have had technology problems, or the system may have incorrectly recorded or failed to preserve your correct answers. Or you may have mistakenly entered correct answers incorrectly or mistakenly skipped sections or questions. We can keep District of Columbia Board of Medicine officials informed of our efforts to requalify you for the USMLE so that they keep your license application open.

District of Columbia Invalidated Exam Score Issues

The USMLE's invalidated exam score policy addresses the opposite issue of the anomalous performance policy, when an exam score is far too high rather than too low, outside the normal distribution of answers. To the USMLE, a very high score may indicate that the examinee had access to the questions before the exam or had assistance from an examinee, materials, or a device during the exam. USMLE analysts can also examine answer patterns for suspicious responses, like getting all previously used questions right but missing new questions, again suggesting prior access to previously used questions. An invalidated score typically means exam disqualification, which would trigger a license application denial by the District of Columbia Board of Medicine.

How We Address Invalidated Exam Scores

The USMLE does not offer a formal adjudication process for invalidated exam scores. Doing so might require disclosure of the question and answer pattern, destroying exam confidentiality or the confidentiality of exam security analysis procedures. We instead would open informal lines of communication with USMLE officials, through which to present the available evidence of your very high MCAT score and medical school exam scores, good character evidence, and other evidence of your diligent preparation and superior standardized test-taking skills. We would also keep District of Columbia Board of Medicine officials informed to keep your license application file open.

District of Columbia Medical Board Response to Exam Issues

District of Columbia Board of Medicine officials must process license applications with reasonable diligence. Applicants expect reasonably responsive action. So does the Board of Medicine. Board officials cannot let a backlog of open license applications build up, frustrating eager and qualified applicants. That's why Board officials may close your license application prematurely before you have had a chance to address and resolve your medical licensing exam issues to clear their docket of older applications. But premature rejection of your application would require you to reapply once you resolved your USMLE issues, starting a new cycle of official reviews and causing you substantial additional time, trouble, cost, and delay. Retain us to keep Board of Medicine officials updated on our diligent efforts to resolve your USMLE issues so that they keep your file open and you don't have to reapply, costing you months or more of licensed medical practice.

District of Columbia Administrative Review Procedures

District of Columbia statutes and Board of Medicine rules offer various forms of review, hearing, and appeal of license denials or other adverse Board of Medicine actions. For instance, District of Columbia Code Section 3-1205.20 authorizes your appeal to the District Court of Appeals of any adverse Board of Medicine action, such as a license denial. We can invoke these protective procedures to reopen your license application file or obtain other relief as we work to resolve your medical licensing exam issues and help you gain a Board of Medicine license.

Premier District of Columbia Medical Licensing Exam Defense

The Lento Law Firm's premier Student Defense Team is available across the District of Columbia to help you resolve your USMLE medical licensing exam issues and qualify you for a District of Columbia Board of Medicine license. Our attorneys represent hundreds of students and graduates across the District of Columbia and nationwide, successfully resolving professional licensing issues and related school issues. Call 888.535.3686 or use our contact form now to retain our skilled and experienced attorneys.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu