Blog

Michigan State Hit With Record $4.5 Million Fine for Violating Clery Act

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Sep 06, 2019 | 0 Comments

The fallout from the Larry Nassar scandal at Michigan State University has continued with a record fine from the U.S. Department of Education and its Office for Civil Rights for the school's violation of the Clery Act.

MSU Fined $4.5 Million for Not Divulging Misconduct Stats

On September 5, 2019, the Department of Education announced that it had imposed a record-setting $4.5 million fine against Michigan State University for Clery Act violations during the Larry Nassar scandal. The fine was also accompanied with a list of things that the school had to do, including overhaul its reporting policies for sexual misconduct allegations and alter its Title IX procedures.

The fine followed what the agency called a “systemic failure to protect students from sexual abuse.” Those problems were uncovered during investigations by the office of Federal Student Aid and the Office for Civil Rights at the Department. Those investigations began back in February 2018 and focused on how Michigan State had handled reports of sexual violence against Larry Nassar.

Larry Nassar had been accused by numerous students at the college, including members of the U.S. women's gymnastics team, of sexual abuse and misconduct.

The investigations found that MSU failed to:

  • Properly classify the incident and disclose them in their campus crime statistics
  • Issue timely warnings under federal regulations
  • Notify campus security staff of incidents
  • Create a system for collecting crime statistics on campus
  • Maintain administrative manpower to protect students from sexual misconduct

In addition to the fine, the Department of Education is requiring MSU to:

  • Establish an independent compliance officer for Clery Act needs
  • Create a Clery Compliance Committee representing offices from across the college
  • Create a system of reporting sexual misconduct incidents to comply with the Clery Act
  • Alter its Title IX policies for when certain officials have to recuse themselves from Title IX investigations

The Clery Act and the Need to Report Sexual Misconduct

Obviously, the fine levied against Michigan State focuses on Clery Act violations rather than direct Title IX issues.

The magnitude of the fine shows the importance of the Clery Act in how the federal government regulates and prohibits sexual misconduct on campus, though. The Clery Act is the centerpiece of the reporting mechanism that requires schools to disclose crimes that happen on campus – including sexual assault and other misconduct.

The size of the Clery Act fine might not even placate some advocates for sexual assault survivors – after all, some high-ranking officials at MSU turned a blind eye to Nassar's misconduct. They are likely to come out and say the fine was far too small for such egregious and active oversight.

Title IX Defense with Joseph D. Lento

Students rarely deal with the requirements of the Clery Act unless they are applying to school and see campus safety reports or are the victim of a crime on campus. Institutions, however, have to comply with federal law and its regulations on a daily basis.

Joseph D. Lento understands the importance of the Clery Act and knows how to utilize it when defending students and faculty members who have been accused of a Title IX violation. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686 for help and guidance.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu