Mishandling of Sexual Misconduct Cases at LSU Shines Light on Student Rights

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Dec 15, 2021 | 0 Comments

Cases of alleged sexual misconduct are extremely delicate. It is imperative that all parties give the accuser the benefit of the doubt, helping them access medical care and other counseling. Nevertheless, the accused have rights, too.

It's easy for some to ignore the rights of the accused. This is especially true when you read stories like the recently reported case of former LSU graduate student Edouard d’Espalungue d’Arros.

A French native student attending graduate school at Louisiana State University, d'Espalungue was charged with third-degree rape in 2018. A grand jury indicted the accused on charges of third-degree rape in February 2021. However, d'Espalungue had been permitted to visit France while awaiting trial and never returned to the United States.

A total of seven women have accused d'Espalungue of sexual misconduct, with at least two of them pursuing criminal complaints. If there were ever cases warranting Title IX investigations, those involving Edouard d'Espalungue d'Arros fit the bill.

Stories of mishandled allegations are a disservice to victims of sexual misdeeds, to be certain. Bungled cases also do those who are falsely accused a major disservice. Some readers may assume that every student accused of sexual misconduct fits the profile of d'Espalungue—they don't.

It Appears That LSU Mishandled Allegations of Sexual Misconduct

Did LSU administrators proceed appropriately in the case of Edouard d'Espalungue d'Arros? Accusers say no.

Details from a lawsuit filed against the university state that the school never launched a Title IX investigation into the accusations against d'Espalungue. Plaintiffs allege that LSU failed to conduct even a cursory probe despite the accused facing numerous complaints.

Taking these allegations at face value, LSU's Title IX office did not uphold its mandate. The subsequent indictment and flight of d'Espalungue only makes the inaction of Title IX officers appear more egregious.

Allegations against both d'Espalungue and LSU are serious. If Title IX officials failed to protect any person as their training warrants, then they should face fair ramifications. Accusers should receive damages for any harm that they have suffered.

That being said, my perspective is that of a student discipline defense advisor. I can't help but see both sides of this case.

Students Accused of Sexual Misconduct Do Have Rights

Those who might ask incredulously how LSU didn't expel d'Espalungue after the first accusation of wrongdoing miss this fact: Students accused of wrongdoing—even heinous acts—have rights.

Universities must honor the rights of both accuser and accused when it comes to sexual misconduct. If accusations warrant it, a school may take interim actions to protect the accused. In the case of d'Espalungue, such actions may have been warranted.

Yet, the accused have a right to due process. They have a right to defend themselves, present exculpatory evidence, and question the credibility of their accusers when appropriate. Even someone such as Edouard d'Espalungue d'Arros has rights under Title IX regulations.

Title IX regulations are, for the most part, straightforward. Schools must follow these regulations—it's federal law. Failure to follow Title IX regulations leaves both accuser and accused without a resolution and can cause disastrous outcomes like those seen in the LSU case.

International Students Need a Title IX Attorney-Advisor

Some have suggested that international students are disadvantaged by Title IX regulations. Language barriers and preexisting biases can put international students at risk of unfair sanctions. Attorney Joseph D. Lento works to ensure due process for every client.

If you are a domestic or international student facing allegations of sexual misconduct, call the Lento Law Firm for help at 888-535-3686 or submit your case online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.