Misconduct Accusation Defense – University of Arizona

Universities maintain strict standards for student conduct, and accusations of code violations often come with stringent disciplinary proceedings and serious consequences. At the University of Arizona, students accused of misconduct could face consequences ranging from a mere warning to expulsion or degree revocation. If you are dealing with accusations of misconduct at the University of Arizona, you are likely concerned about resulting disciplinary proceedings. Many potential sanctions can have lifelong consequences, and school administrators are often too quick to dole out harsh punishments. In such cases, your best course of action is to reach out to the Lento Law Firm Student Defense Team. Our team has many years of experience defending students accused of misconduct in Arizona and nationwide. To safeguard your future with the best defense possible, call the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686 or tell us about your case online.

What Does the University of Arizona Consider Misconduct?

The University of Arizona Student Code of Conduct includes a vast list of prohibited conduct, such as:

  • Academic dishonestly, including cheating and plagiarism
  • Forgery or unauthorized alteration of campus documents or records
  • Filing a false report or a false emergency warning
  • Impersonation of a university employee
  • Theft, damage, or destruction of university property
  • Possession of stolen property
  • Gambling
  • Hazing
  • Unauthorized possession or sale of alcohol or controlled substances
  • Discrimination and harassment
  • Sexual misconduct
  • Possession of a weapon
  • Any violation of federal, state, or local laws

As evidenced by this list, there is a large range of possible offenses that could leave you in trouble with the board. Whether you are facing minor accusations of academic dishonesty or you are worried about a potential dismissal over hazing accusations, the Lento Law Firm's Student Defense Team can help.

What are the Investigative Procedures for Misconduct Accusations at the University of Arizona?

The University of Arizona lays out specific disciplinary procedures that follow accusations of misconduct. The Dean of Students is responsible for commencing any disciplinary investigation, which may be prompted by a written referral, media reports, or other sources that the Dean deems to be reliable. During the course of the investigation, the Dean may choose to impose an interim action, such as temporary suspension, exclusion from housing, or removal from a class, if they have reason to believe that the accused student will cause harm or significant disruption by remaining on campus.

After conducting interviews and collecting information, the Dean will make an initiation determination as to whether there is sufficient reason to pursue further investigation into the alleged violation. Prior to any final decision that a violation has occurred, the accused student has a right to meet with the Dean and respond to the information gathered surrounding the accusations. If the Dean determines that it is more likely than not that a violation has occurred, they will then make a determination as to the appropriate disciplinary sanction. If the accused student is facing suspension, expulsion, or degree revocation, they will have a right to file a written request for a hearing before the University Hearing Board to review the decision.

What is the Hearing Process for Accusations of Misconduct at the University of Arizona?

The Hearing Board is comprised of five members: two students, two faculty, and one non-faculty employee. The Board will conduct a closed hearing in which they consider submitted evidence such as statements and documents, and the student will be able to provide oral presentation and examine witnesses. The burden of proof in these hearings lies with the university, meaning that it is up to their representative to show that a violation of the Student Code of Conduct was more likely than not to have occurred. Once a decision about whether or not there has been a violation is made, or if the student accepts responsibility for the violation, the Board will turn its attention to determining the appropriate sanction, taking into consideration any aggravating or mitigating circumstances. The Hearing Board will then make a recommendation to the provost about whether or not a violation has been committed and, if so, what the appropriate sanction should be. It is then up to the provost to make a final decision within 20 days of receiving the recommendation from the Hearing Board. Beyond this decision, the student will have 15 days to appeal charges of misconduct and the imposed sanction.

What are the Consequences for Conduct Violations at the University of Arizona?

Potential sanctions imposed by the Dean of Students or the provost vary greatly and include the following:

  • Written warning
  • Restricted access to university property or revocation of privileges to university social events
  • Permanent notation on the transcript
  • Restitution
  • Administrative hold
  • Conditioned probation
  • Suspension
  • Expulsion
  • Degree revocation

If you are concerned that you may be facing extreme sanctions like suspension or dismissal from the University of Arizona, it is essential that you reach out to the Lento Law Firm for help crafting a strong defense as soon as possible.

How the Lento Law Firm Can Help Defend You Against Misconduct Accusations at the University of Arizona

The Lento Law Firm's Student Defense Team has many years of experience helping students who are accused of misconduct by their university. This nationwide experience negotiating with school boards and safeguarding students' rights makes us well-positioned to help you navigate any accusations of wrongdoing. Our team also understands how accusations and disciplinary measures can become exacerbated, and we appreciate the severity of the consequences that can come as a result of university decisions. A mark on your permanent academic record, a suspension, and even a dismissal are actions that could follow you for the rest of your academic and professional career. Avoid handling such a complex and high-stakes situation by yourself or with representation from an inexperienced law office. Instead, rely on our experienced team of National Education Lawyers to stand behind you, crafting the best defense possible and preparing you for any formal or informal hearing, investigation, or negotiation. Call us today at 888-535-3686 or tell us about your case online.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu