Lawmakers Pen Missive to Devos

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jul 13, 2020 | 0 Comments

Four Democratic lawmakers are demanding that the U.S. Department of Education provide documents related to sweeping changes recently made to federal Title IX regulations. Title IX is a federal civil rights law enacted as part of the Education Amendments of 1972 ("Title IX"), 20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq. The legislation prohibits sex discrimination in hiring, admissions, financial aid, and athletics in federally funded K-12 and colleges and universities.

Changes to Title IX Regulations

Recent changes to Title IX regulations established due process protections for those accused of sexual harassment, assault, or intimate partner violence on college campuses. Among the additions include the right of both the accuser and the accused to cross-examine witnesses. Critics of the change worry that the accused's right to cross-examine an accuser will discourage victims of sexual violence from coming forward.

The new rules also change the definition of sexual harassment, defining it as either:

  • A "school employee conditioning education benefits on participation in unwelcome sexual conduct,"
  • "Unwelcome conduct that a reasonable person would determine is so severe, pervasive and objectively offensive that it effectively denies a person equal access to the school's education program or activity," or 
  • "Sexual assault, dating violence, domestic violence, and stalking."

While schools must still investigate any complaint, they must dismiss allegations that don't meet the new definition of sexual assault.

After the Department of Education (D.O.E.) published the final rules in May of 2020, 18 states and the District of Columbia challenged the regulations in federal court, which will go into effect on August 1, 2020. In the suit, the attorneys general argue that the new Title IX rules will undermine civil rights gains for victims of sexual assault and that some changes are "arbitrary and capricious." 

Letter to Devos from Democratic Lawmakers

In June of 2020, House Oversight Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney and Representatives Jackie Speier, Ayanna Pressley, and Brenda Lawrence sent Secretary of Education Betsy Devos a letter requesting documents and communications related to the new Title IX rule's development, dating back to 2017. The lawmakers requested the information by July 3, 2020, noting that they had previously requested the same information in February of 2020. In February, the D.O.E. responded by noting that legal authorities prohibited the department from commenting on a rule after proposing it but before finalizing it.

The lawmakers call the D.O.E.'s decision to finalize the Title IX rules during a pandemic, "alarming and irresponsible." The group wrote that "As Members of the Committee and leaders of the Democratic Women's Caucus, we are troubled by the Department's decision to finalize this harmful rule while stonewalling appropriate oversight of the rulemaking process." While Democratic lawmakers may make more noise about the new Title IX regulations, it's unlikely that they will be able to stop promulgation of the new rules without full congressional action. However, the states' lawsuit in federal court may halt the rollout of the new regulations.

Hire an Experienced Title IX Lawyer

If your student faces Title IX allegations or an investigation in college or high school, you need an experienced lawyer who understands the high stakes and the complicated legal issues. Attorney Joseph Lento has successfully represented students at thousands of schools across the country facing Title IX and other student disciplinary issues. Give our office a call at 888-535-3686 or contact us online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.