Blog

Kentucky Colleges Sue Their Own Student Newspapers Over Title IX Documents

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 24, 2019 | 0 Comments

The conflicting interests involved in Title IX allegations of sexual misconduct have reached an extraordinary level of absurdity in Kentucky.

University of Kentucky Sues Its Own Students to Hide Title IX Documents

Way back in 2016, the students working at the student newspapers at the University of Kentucky and Western Kentucky University – the Kentucky Kernal and the College Heights Herald, respectively – filed public records requests for documents related to Title IX investigations into sexual harassment and sexual assault by school employees. The schools refused to comply with the requests, claiming that the records were protected by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA).

In a quirk of Kentucky's public records law, both colleges had to file a lawsuit against their own student newspapers to challenge the disclosure of the information.

The University of Kentucky and Western Kentucky University also claimed that they were fighting for the privacy rights of the students who claimed to have been victimized and were listed in the reports. However, the two student newspapers had requested identical information from other Kentucky schools, and those schools had complied with the requests.

Students and their attorneys in the lawsuit believe that UK and WKU are fighting the record disclosure in order to protect their reputations. Supporting that idea is the fact that the investigative work of one of the student reporters at the College Heights Herald, Nicole Ares, has garnered her several prestigious awards for student journalism. While Western Kentucky University usually touts the achievements of its students, it has refused to acknowledge her work or its recognition.

Appellate Court Looks for a Middle Ground

The dispute went all the way to court, with the trial court siding with the newspapers – the colleges had an obligation to turn over records related to sexual harassment and assault allegations against professors and employees, though they could be redacted to preserve the privacy of those involved.

The University of Kentucky appealed.

On May 17, the Kentucky Court of Appeals weighed in, saying that UK was right in that FERPA was at play and that the people in the documents have privacy rights, but that this was not enough to support the school's blanket claim that it could refuse disclosure of all of the documents.

The Court of Appeals sent the case back to the trial court for UK to adequately redact the documents and legally justify any documents it wants to withhold.

National Title IX Advisor Joseph D. Lento

The confusing and needlessly complex situation is just another example of what happens when there are so many conflicting interests at play. Schools are in an impossible position where they have to come down hard enough on students and employees who have been accused of sexual misconduct that the school's federal funding is protected. However, they cannot come down on the accused so hard that they violate their due process rights. Throughout, schools want to maintain their reputation as a safe place for students to come for college.

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and national Title IX advisorContact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686 if you have been accused of sexual misconduct.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu