The Kent State Field Hockey Game Fiasco is All Just a Contract Dispute

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Oct 11, 2019 | 0 Comments

In our last blog post, we discussed the continued fallout from a canceled field hockey game at Kent State University. The short of it is this: A women's field hockey game between Temple and the University of Maine was canceled in double-overtime to clear the field for a pre-game fireworks display for Kent State's football team. There was an uproar in the media. Maine filed a Title IX claim at Kent State. Kent State found itself not responsible for gender discrimination. There was another media uproar.

It seems like lots of people want to make this about gender disparity and not what it really is: A contract dispute about field space that came from scheduling events too tightly.

Remember: Neither Field Hockey Team Was Kent State's

The first thing to remember, here, is that the field hockey game that was happening at Kent State was between the University of Maine and Temple University. Neither team was Kent State's team. The reason the game was happening at Kent State seems to have been scheduling efficiency: Kent State was hosting both Temple and UMaine over the weekend, already, so they let UMaine and Temple rent a field to play each other while they were both in the area.

This is important because why would Kent State delay a fireworks display for its own team in order to let two random schools play past their contractual end time?

This is All a Contract Dispute

The agreement between Kent State and the two field hockey teams was to let them use Kent State's field space for their game.

That's a contract: Temple and UMaine agreed with Kent State to use their field for their game. There might have been a rental payment. There was definitely a written rental agreement that was signed. That agreement had terms that UMaine and Temple had to abide by.

Whether that contract explicitly said the teams had to be off the field at 10:30 a.m., whether Kent State effectively communicated this requirement orally or in additional writing, or whether there was no communication whatsoever are all questions at the center of this contract dispute.

Not Kicking the Teams Off Would Have Led to Other Problems

Imagine Kent State allowing the field hockey game to proceed. Between the last 10-minute overtime period and a penalty shootout, the game could have lasted another 20 minutes. The time was already 10:45 – 15 minutes after the teams should have been off the field to make way for the fire marshal mandated setup protocol for fireworks displays. Allowing two other schools to finish their game could have pushed the fireworks display – one that thousands of fans had been promised – back over half an hour. It could have even delayed Kent State's own football game if the scheduling was tight.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Painting this contract dispute as gender discrimination is a huge exaggeration that looks past some of the basic details of what happened.

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer who represents students and faculty members accused of on-campus sexual misconduct. Contact him online or call him at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.