Is Plagiarism Detection Software The Answer to Misconduct Concerns?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 02, 2018 | 0 Comments

Academic integrity has always been an integral part of the reason why educational environments like colleges and universities thrive and are effective. As a result, a breach of this integrity, which is referred to as academic misconduct by most institutions, is not tolerated at any level. Among the many forms of academic misconduct, student plagiarism has proven to be one of the the most popular types of misconduct committed on college campuses, frustrating many professors, instructors, and teachers assistants.

Plagiarism detection services intended to reveal a lack of originality in submitted works have become commonplace in college courses. Since the implementation of these services, academic misconduct rates on many campuses are through the roof. Skeptics of plagiarism detection services have come up with studies and collected data that challenges the validity and usefulness of these devices in college settings.

One of the most popular services for identifying plagiarism in academic works is Turnitin. To use this service, students are required to upload their essay, reports, and other coursework into this program. In a few moments, it displays an originality report that compares the text submitted to its massive database of student work, websites, books, articles etc. What writing students have discovered about the service is that the instances of “non-originality” Turnitin detects in most cases isn't plagiarism, but the use of jargon, common terms, and the lack of originality one would expect of a college freshman. In some cases, the service has been found to not provide the correct source from which a student's paper was supposedly plagiarized.

A former student at Rutgers University, by the name of Amanda Serpico, says she was a victim of a Turnitin false positive. The plagiarism detection system concluded that parts of her paper on gay marriage laws were lifted from other sources, which lead to an academic misconduct report to the dean. Due to this finding, a lengthy and complex process disciplinary process ensued, forcing Serpico to attend numerous meetings and to write several appeals to prove her innocence.

Ultimately, Serpico's appeal was rejected and she was found guilty of plagiarism this past spring, she received an “F” on her final, which means she failed her course. She was scheduled to graduate in May with a double major, but she only walked across that stage for one major. She claims her senior year was ruined due to what she, and the institution, acknowledges as a mistake. The most disheartening aspect of this situation is that Serpico likely isn't the only one to suffer due to the false positives Turnitin and other detection services conclude. Unfortunately, as schools rely more heavily on these services, more innocent students will be unfairly penalized for academic misconduct.

Student Defense Attorney Helping Clients Nationwide

Allegations of academic misconduct are serious and should be treated as such. If you believe that your allegations are unjustified, you need the help of a student defense attorney. Joseph D. Lento has extensive experience helping students who've acquired academic misconduct charges prevail in disciplinary hearings, and he as the skill and expertise to help you do the same. Contact him today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.