Is an Uptick in Donations to Female Sports Teams the Result of Discrimination?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Dec 11, 2019 | 0 Comments

A recent article in The New York Times detailed an uptick in philanthropy to colleges and universities to upgrade women's sporting facilities. The insinuation in the article, though – that women are donating to female sports teams because of gender discrimination and Title IX – overlooks some other very important considerations.

Article Reports an Increase in Donations for Female Sports Teams

The article, titled “A Welcome Funding Source for College Athletics: Women Investing in Women's Sports,” tells the story of women who competed in sports in the 1970s and 80s. They played on substandard fields and in secondary facilities that paled in comparison to those enjoyed by the men who played the same sport.

Now, many of those same women have enjoyed successful professional careers or are otherwise in charge of vast sums of money and wealth. Many of them are now donating some of it back to their alma maters, and many of those donations are targeting the sporting discrepancy between genders.

Carol Roberts, for example, played field hockey at Yale in the late 1970s. Now 59 and the CFO at the largest paper company in the world, she donated $4 million to build a new field house for Yale's field hockey team.

The article lists numerous other donations by women, for women's teams.

The Insinuation: Underfunding Women's Teams is Discrimination

The words “Title IX” are only used twice in the article – once in the article's subtitle and once in the article's fourth paragraph. Both instances point out that the donations are surging now that Title IX is approaching its 50th anniversary – the very first beneficiaries of the law are now approaching the age in which donations and philanthropy peak.

However, the references are enough to create an insinuation that these donations are making up for an underfunding that is per se gender discrimination.

The Reality: The Driving Force is Economics

Automatically calling it discriminatory, though, overlooks the most important driving force in how large institutions like colleges spend their money: Economics.

Simply put, investing in major men's sports like basketball and football draws crowds of hundreds of thousands to games and sells lots of other merchandise. It makes money.

Far fewer people spend money on smaller sports like lacrosse or field hockey, and even less money gets spent on women's sports. Expecting schools to invest identical amounts in men's football and women's softball – or even in men's and women's basketball – is simply absurd so long as the return on that investment is unequal. It's not discrimination: It's an investment decision based on economics.

Title IX Defense Lawyer and Advisor: Joseph D. Lento

So many decisions that have disparate outcomes for men and women are being called discriminatory. But true discrimination relies heavily on the intent of the actor: It is not discrimination when there is no intent to discriminate and the results are different for men and women for non-discriminatory reasons.

That is why Joseph D. Lento works as a Title IX defense lawyer and as a national Title IX advisor. He defends against claims of sexual misconduct and gender discrimination. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website.  In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County.  In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County,  In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties.  Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law.  The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship.  The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.