Blog

Expelled Wide Receiver Sues for Violating His Fifth Amendment Right Against Self-Incrimination in Title IX Case

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 16, 2019 | 0 Comments

The unique process of Title IX investigations often run parallel to criminal investigations and charges. This is especially common for severe allegations of sexual misconduct, like rape. When these two investigations are going on at the same time, though, they can impact each other in serious ways that can infringe on the rights of the person accused of misconduct.

An ongoing situation at the University of Wisconsin involving a member of the school's football team is an excellent example of how a Title IX investigation can impact your Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

Wisconsin Wide Receiver Accused of Rape on Campus

Two women at the University of Wisconsin accused Quintez Cephus, a wide receiver on the school's football team, of raping them in April 2018. Cephus claimed that the sex was consensual, but the women claimed they were too intoxicated to consent.

The college opened a Title IX investigation into the incident. Then, in August, prosecutors filed criminal charges against Cephus.

Because Title IX cases tend to move quicker than criminal cases, Cephus was faced with a dilemma: He could either participate in the Title IX case to defend himself, or he could invoke his Fifth Amendment rights to defend against the criminal charge. If he spoke out against the allegations during the Title IX hearing, whatever he said could be used against him in court.

When Cephus asked the school to delay the Title IX case until the criminal case had resolved, the university refused. When he insisted that the school consider exculpatory evidence that prosecutors had obtained, his words fell on deaf ears.

He was subsequently found in violation of the school's code of conduct. He was expelled from the University of Wisconsin for sexual misconduct.

The jury in his criminal case acquitted him on all charges.

Student Sues School for Violating Fifth Amendment

Cephus has now filed a lawsuit against the University of Wisconsin. Among his claims is an argument that the school violated his due process rights by putting him into a position where he could either participate in the Title IX process or invoke his Fifth Amendment rights. By not delaying the Title IX case, the school forced Cephus to decide which one to defend against.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

The dilemma is very real, especially for people accused of such a severe instance of sexual misconduct.

On the one hand, a criminal conviction can lead to a lengthy jail sentence – in this case, up to 40 years in jail – and could require you to register as a sex offender for the rest of your life.

On the other hand, getting expelled from college is far from a trivial repercussion. Not having a college degree virtually guarantees a difficult career, which can keep you from fully enjoying your life.

Because Title IX violations can be handed out on a preponderance of the evidence standard – meaning a panel only has to decide that you “more likely than not” committed the violation – not participating in the investigation and hearing can doom your case. But when participating increases the odds of a criminal conviction, it can seem like an impossible choice to make.

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and national advisorContact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website.  In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County.  In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County,  In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties.  Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law.  The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship.  The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu