Blog

How Are Schools Handling Title IX Proceedings During the Coronavirus Shutdown?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Mar 24, 2020 | 0 Comments

Even though the coronavirus has closed schools across the country, Title IX proceedings are continuing from allegations made while school was still in session and students were still on campus. While schools have largely succeeded in moving those investigations online, there are real questions about whether online hearings will allow for accurate determinations of credibility, as well as whether schools can conduct a prompt Title IX investigation that complies with federal law.

Schools Close, Title IX Cases Continue

Colleges across the U.S. were quick to close and send students home to stem the spread of COVID-19 or the coronavirus. Tens of thousands of students have been affected.

While they are not on campus, anymore, the Title IX allegations that had been pending when the closures went into effect are still moving forward. Claims of sexual misconduct were in all of the different stages of resolution at the time of the shutdown, from just received allegations to initial stages of the investigation process, all the way through sentencing determinations for those had been found in violation by hearing boards.

Even though they have been shut down to students and their campuses are empty, schools are still contacting students about new cases that have been initiated and which name them as defendants. Schools are still scheduling interviews between Title IX investigators and both complainants and defendants.

However, because these parties are no longer on campus and can even be in different countries, these hearings are being done remotely with one of a variety of teleconference options.

Are Title IX Hearings Via Video Chat Reliable?

To an extent, there are some concerns about the reliability of video chats for such sensitive conversations. Title IX investigators are often faced with the nearly impossible task of determining which side of a story is more believable – the complainant's version, where they were victims of abuse, or the accused's side of the story, where it either didn't happen or was consensual. Making a reliable credibility determination is difficult enough. Having to do it through online conversations rather than in-person can make this difficult task even harder and less reliable and that is why, whether during this challenging time due to the health crisis or even under the best of circumstances, having an attorney advisor with the requisite experience and resources to effectively and successfully represent those accused is critical to in an effort to ensure a fair process and a favorable outcome.

Are Schools Going to be Able to Provide a Prompt Investigation?

Federal law requires Title IX investigations to be done relatively quickly. However, 34 C.F.R. § 668.46 does not set a hard timeline for these investigations. Instead, it merely says that Title IX investigations should be “completed within reasonably prompt timeframes.”

Because there are no hard rules on how quickly the investigation has to reach a resolution, those who have pending Title IX cases are unlikely to get very far by arguing that the coronavirus shutdown has drawn out their case for too long. Courts hearing such an argument are likely to decide that the exceptional circumstances at play overwhelm the soft rules that call for expediency.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and a national Title advisor. Call his law office at (888) 535-3686 or contact him online if you have been accused of sexual misconduct at a college.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges locally and nationwide while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu