Blog

​Front Pay Awarded to Women's Hockey Coach Who Was Let Go After Making Title IX Claim

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Feb 27, 2019 | 0 Comments

Title IX lawsuit in Minnesota involving one of the most decorated women's hockey coaches in history has led to a rare award of front pay for her loss of a position.

Coaches Flee University of Minnesota Duluth, Then Bring Title IX Claims

Shannon Miller was the women's hockey coach at the University of Minnesota at Duluth (UMD), breaking records for amassing wins, Frozen Four Tournaments, and national championships in the women's hockey and college hockey worlds. When she and several other women coaches at UMD were refused contract extensions after filing Title IX allegations against UMD for a hostile working environment due to gender and sexual orientation discrimination, they sued the school for retaliating against them for raising their Title IX rights.

Hockey Coach Wins $3.74 Million Verdict for Retaliatory Termination

After numerous motions and hundreds of pages of filings that ended the claims of the other coaches, the trial was held in March 2018. It ended with the jury finding that UMD had violated Title IX, and awarded Ms. Miller $3.74 million – over $740,000 for lost wages and another $3 million for emotional distress. The lost wages were meant to cover for Ms. Miller's back pay or the income that she would have received between the non-renewal of her contract and the date of the verdict.

At the time of the trial, the court had declined to determine whether to award front pay or income that Ms. Miller would have reasonably anticipated after the date of the verdict, had her contract been extended.

Court Adds Front Pay to Verdict, But Declines to Reinstate Coach

Since the verdict, the court was brought back to the case by numerous motions by UMD, challenging the outcome, and by Ms. Miller, asking for reinstatement to her old position as women's hockey coach.

The court refused to reinstate Ms. Miller, in part because it would upset the structure of the team, which had been entirely recruited by Ms. Miller's successor, and in part because Ms. Miller was claiming that she would have remained in the program for another 12 to 15 years, bringing her tenure on the team to an exceedingly rare 35 years.

Instead, the court opted to award Ms. Miller front pay – the amount of wages that she would have expected to receive had she not been let go – in the amount of $461,278. The amount was meant to cover a coaching tenure that would have ended at UMD in 2020, minus the income that Ms. Miller made while coaching in the Canadian Women's Hockey League.

Appeals Likely

Now that the verdict and award are finalized, UMD is expected to ask the court to overturn or reduce the verdict, and if that does not work, they are expected to appeal the outcome.

National Title IX Attorney Joseph D. Lento

As we will show in a future blog post, there were numerous important intangibles that were present in this case that highlight how tricky, and even fickle, the Title IX process can be.

Joseph D. Lento, a Title IX advisor, is watching the process of this case through the court system closely. Contact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges locally and nationwide while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

Footer 2

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu