Blog

Graduate Students Unionize From Coast to Coast

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Mar 03, 2023 | 0 Comments

In the fall of 2022, graduate students at 10 of the University of California ("UC System") campuses organized a walk-off strike, resulting in one of the largest higher education strikes in the United States. At the end of almost five weeks, the UC system reached an agreement with approximately 12,000 graduate and postdoctoral employees bartering for higher salaries and additional benefits. Still, some graduate assistants continued to protest and held out hope for benefits such as child-care subsidies. The strike soon spread across the United States, with graduate students from coast to coast demanding better compensation and stipends from their respective programs.

Some of these strikes were ultimately successful, even if the unionization efforts fell flat. For example, although the University of Indiana refused to unionize its graduate students, the school announced "policy changes" that would address the main demands at issue. Unionization efforts are also underway at schools such as the University of Chicago, Johns Hopkins, and Yale.

While many of these unionization efforts have been and are shaping out to be successful, other campuses have made it quite clear that policy changes will not take place. For instance, Temple University recently announced that any students taking part in protests challenging graduate students' pay would have health insurance suspended and lose academic financing for their tuition. Given the fact that these students were already protesting their wages and benefits, additional hits to their healthcare coverage and tuition costs seem fatal. But this case highlights an important discussion on this topic. At what point are these students "students" rather than employees and vice versa? Does educational law control? How about contract law or the school's handbook?

The National Labor Relations Board Weighs In

In March 2021, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") announced that students who are "financially compensated in connection with their studies," would no longer be "wholly dependent on their administrators to recognize them voluntarily." In other words, under the NLRB's new policies, graduate students may participate in collective bargaining agreements with their schools which will be subject to NLRB oversight. As the power has shifted toward NLRB oversight rather than administration review, many point out that graduate students are, first and foremost, now seen as "employees" in their employment contracts rather than simply students.

While the NLRB's policies certainly afford graduate students new collective bargaining rights, the undercurrent of their school's threatening tactics, policies, and politics remain. For many graduate and postdoctoral students, recommendations and alumni support mean everything. At this point in their academic career, many have spent years slaving away in their individual pursuits, fallen into large amounts of debt, and made several personal sacrifices. At this juncture, it is not surprising that these students may feel torn between advocating for better pay and benefits while still maintaining a good relationship with their academic institution.

Are You Worried Your School Will Retaliate Against You for Unionizing or Protesting?

If you are a graduate student or postdoctoral fellow and fear that your academic institution will retaliate against you for protesting or unionization efforts, national attorney-advisor Joseph D. Lento and his Educational Law Team at the Lento Law Firm can help. We have decades of experience working with academic institutions at the ground level and successfully advocate for students, often without unnecessary litigation. Don't jeopardize your future. Contact us today by calling (888) 535-3686 or using our online contact form.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu