Facing Education Challenges in North Carolina? The Lento Law Firm Has You Covered

North Carolina's education system is one of the highest-ranked in the nation, from the sprawling campuses of universities like the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and North Carolina State in the Triangle to the bustling suburban school districts of Wake County and Charlotte-Mecklenburg. These institutions serve thousands of students. Each student (and their parents!) navigates a web of policies, expectations, and legal frameworks that govern their academic lives. For parents of K-12 and college students alike, the stakes are high. A single misstep, whether it's a disciplinary action, a denied accommodation, or an unresolved harassment complaint can radically change the trajectory of your student's life.

The issues students encounter are as varied as the state's landscape. A high schooler in Wake County might face an unfair suspension over a dress code violation. A college student at Appalachian State could struggle to secure a disability accommodation for a difficult midterm exam, even though the accommodation is protected by federal law. These are not minor bumps in the road; they're threats to futures. North Carolina's education authorities, primarily the Department of Public Instruction (DPI) for K-12 and individual university boards for higher education, wield significant power. They can impose sanctions, withhold services, or escalate matters to formal hearings.

The skilled and experienced education lawyers at the Lento Law Firm stand ready to intervene. Our team offers precise, experienced representation to protect students' rights and their futures. Don't let a school's decision dictate your path. Call the Lento Law Firm at 888.535.3686 or submit our online contact form to secure your defense today.

Who Has Authority over Education in North Carolina?

Under North Carolina law, authority over education splits into two distinct lanes. For K-12, the DPI governs public schools under the State Board of Education. This agency sets standards and investigates violations of state and federal law. If a student faces expulsion, the DPI's policies largely control the process. Throughout the process, Superintendents and principals ultimately answer to the DPI. Misconduct allegations, from cheating to bullying, can trigger investigations, hearings, and penalties ranging from suspensions to permanent expulsion from the district.

Higher education operates differently. Public universities like UNC Charlotte or East Carolina University fall under the UNC System's Board of Governors, even if the university doesn't contain “UNC” in its name. However, each campus maintains its own conduct codes and disciplinary bodies.

Special Education & Disability Rights: Holding Schools Accountable

Disability rights have historically led to many of the fiercest education battles. North Carolina schools and colleges must comply with federal mandates, such as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). For K-12, the DPI oversees implementation, ensuring districts provide appropriate public education to students with disabilities. Universities, meanwhile, answer to their own disability services offices, monitored by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR).

Unfortunately, compliance can be hit and miss. For example, North Carolina requires that students with disabilities be evaluated for a special education plan within 90 days. Due to a lack of funding or improper training, many school districts fail to meet this timeline. At the university level, a student at UNC Wilmington could request note-taking assistance under the ADA, only to face denials and doubts.

Violations trigger complaints to the DPI or OCR. If a complaint is substantiated, both the DPI and OCR are permitted to launch investigations and take corrective action. The DPI can order corrective plans or withhold funding from noncompliant districts. OCR probes universities, with findings potentially leading to federal sanctions or lawsuits.

The consequences of a DPI or OCR investigation hit hard. Schools might face state audits or loss of accreditation points. Students, though, suffer the most. For students with disabilities, denied services can mean falling grades, missed milestones, or emotional turmoil. When administrators drag their heels, the education lawyers at the Lento Law Firm tackle these cases head-on. Our filed complaints demand evaluations and insist upon compliance, ensuring students get what the law guarantees.

IDEA, Individualized Education Programs (IEPs) & 504 Plans

IEPs and 504 Plans form the legal backbone for students with disabilities. In North Carolina's K-12 system, the DPI mandates IEPs under IDEA for students needing specialized instruction. For example, think of a dyslexic teen in Huntersville needing reading intervention.

Section 504 Plans, broader in scope, cover students with disabilities requiring accommodation. For example, a diabetic child needs snack breaks. Colleges don't follow under IDEA. However, they must offer “reasonable accommodations” for students with disabilities.

For IEPs, once a parent requests an evaluation, schools must assess the student within a 90-day window. Within that timeframe, the school needs to draft plans detailing services, such as speech therapy, modified assignments, or whatever fits. If there is a dispute between the parent and the school, the DPI is required to hold a hearing within 45 days.

Colleges handle disability requests internally, but they are required to give reasonable accommodation. If a dispute arises, each university has a unique process for handling it. Ultimately, OCR has the legal authority to settle the dispute and determine what accommodations, if any, are reasonable.

Students become victims when schools shirk their responsibility. A K-12 IEP might lack promised tutoring, leaving a child floundering. A UNC Charlotte student might be refused the option to type an essay instead of handwriting it, tanking their GPA. This is where the Lento Law Firm steps in, reviewing plans, appealing denials, and pushing for full implementation. School is hard enough. Let our team of experienced education lawyers fight for your student's right to a fair education.

Bullying & Harassment: Confronting a Persistent Threat

Nothing quite like bullying can ruin a student's educational journey. A student in Charlotte-Mecklenburg might endure relentless taunts over their appearance. At Appalachian State, a freshman could face sexual harassment in a dorm. Fortunately, these incidents can be prevented. Schools must act, but too often, they don't.

For K-12, North Carolina's School Violence Prevention Act demands policies against bullying. School districts must investigate complaints, whether they come from teachers or parents, within days. If the school fails to investigate, the DPI can investigate. These investigations can force policy rewrites or staff discipline. Unfortunately, students rarely see justice. This is because the process is largely administrative and does not address the underlying issue: bullying.

Colleges face stiffer oversight. Title IX coordinators at UNC Wilmington or NC State must probe sexual harassment claims. Under federal law, probes typically must be initiated within 60 days.

The consequences of harassment and bullying can last a lifetime. A bullied student might drop grades or quit extracurriculars. A harassed ECU undergrad might feel pressured to abandon higher education altogether. Our education lawyers at the Lento Law Firm fight to ensure this does not happen. We file complaints with DPI or OCR, press for thorough investigations, negotiate for beneficial outcomes, and sue when schools and regulators dodge accountability.

Discipline & Expulsions: Defending Against Harsh School Actions

Disciplinary measures in North Carolina's education system carry a sharp edge, rarely being proportional to the crime. In suburban districts like Wake County or Union County, a high school student might face suspension over something as simple as a heated classroom outburst. At universities like UNC Chapel Hill or East Carolina University, a dorm party gone awry could land a student before a conduct board. For parents and students, the fallout is disastrous: missed classes, stalled transcripts, or a permanent mark that stains the student's record.

North Carolina law lays out the K-12 process clearly. Short-term suspensions (up to 10 days) require only informal notice. Often, this is just a letter home. For long-term suspensions or expulsions, the principal must refer the matter to the superintendent. Schools must provide written allegations and a hearing within 10 school days.

Colleges operate under looser reins but no less force. UNC System schools follow internal codes, like NC State's Student Conduct Policy, which outlines hearings for offenses from cheating to fighting. There is a lot of variation between universities. A student at UNC Raleigh might get the opportunity for a full hearing with ten days to prepare, while a student at Chapel Hill might receive only an informal opportunity to claim their innocence.

Universities tend to make their decisions quickly. The consequences can range from probation, suspension, or even degree revocation. Due to the rigid semester or trimester schedule most universities follow, a simple suspension can delay graduation up to a year or more.

Trouble brews when schools overreach. A teen might get expelled for a zero-tolerance vape violation despite shaky evidence. A Greensboro undergrad could face suspension over a vague “disruptive conduct on campus” allegation. The Education Law Team at the Lento Law Firm challenges flimsy accusations, demands procedural adherence, and negotiates with DPI officials or university deans to soften penalties. Whether it's a high schooler in Cary or a senior at UNC Wilmington, our team aims to keep their education intact.

Discrimination Cases: Leveling the Playing Field

Discrimination is sadly all too common in North Carolina's education spaces. A Black student in Union County might face unequal discipline, such as longer suspensions than peers. A transgender undergrad at UNC Charlotte could get locked out of gender-appropriate facilities, breaching Title IX. Federal and state laws ban racial, gender, and disability bias. Enforcement falls to DPI for K-12 and OCR for colleges, with the North Carolina Human Relations Commission as a backstop.

Investigations start with complaints. A parent might report racial slurs ignored by staff. Then, the DPI's Equity Office reviews and might demand records within 30 days. A Raleigh student might flag disability discrimination that prompts an OCR investigation. DPI and OCR might look at evidence such as testimonies, school policies, and data of similar incidents to make an informed ruling. Rulings can mandate training, restitution, or federal monitoring. Schools that do not comply risk losing their accreditation. Universities face lawsuits and court orders. Students, though, bear the brunt, often being forced to transfer or carrying long-term emotional scars.

The education lawyers at the Lento Law Firm counter these injustices. We gather proof, negotiate with school districts and universities, argue before DPI or OCR, and litigate when talks fail. Schools and universities often have large legal teams. We help level the odds in your and your student's favor.

Student Rights & Free Speech Under the First Amendment

In a battleground state like North Carolina, tensions flare around controversial issues. A high schooler might get suspended for a protest T-shirt. An NC State student could face a conduct charge over an allegedly insensitive social media post. The First Amendment shields their right to free speech, but schools test limits. Both universities and schools tend to prohibit speech that “disrupts.” These policies are broadly worded and often arbitrarily enforced.

DPI handles K-12 disputes, reviewing dress code bans or speech restrictions. A principal might justify suspending a student for a Confederate flag shirt. DPI could reverse it if the principal failed to follow procedural safeguards. Universities largely self-regulate. UNC Chapel Hill's speech policy, for instance, allows administrators to place “reasonable” restrictions on free speech.

As always, it is students who pay the price. In one of the most politically active states in the country, students frequently suffer from silenced voices and stalled activism. At the Lento Law Firm, our Education Law Team knows that the right to hold and express an opinion doesn't go away when you cross onto school property. When a school or university uses their authority to arbitrarily stifle and discipline student speech, we stand by to fight for and protect their rights.

Trust the Lento Law Firm to Fight for Your Education

From IEPs to expulsions, bullying to free speech, schools and colleges have a lot of responsibilities to keep you and your student's education safe and of high quality. A complaint to DPI and university boards can spur change, but sometimes that isn't enough. Sometimes, your student slips through the cracks, or an administrator drags their heels a little bit too long. The Lento Law Firm and our team of education lawyers have spent many years cutting through bureaucracy and bias with seasoned precision.

Let us shield your education today. The consequences of inaction last a lifetime. Contact the Lento Law Firm at 888.535.3686 or fill out our online contact form today.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu