Exams Written by Robots: Friend or Foe to Students?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Feb 05, 2022 | 0 Comments

When COVID forced classes off campus and onto the internet at the start of the pandemic, University faculty, staff, and students scrambled to adjust. A wrench was thrown into academia as we know it, affecting the very means by which students receive and digest information – as well as how they're tested on it. The playing field for academic integrity changed, and shifting circumstances led to a spike in infractions across the world. In response, institutions have gone to great lengths to mitigate cheating and plagiarism – but how far is too far?

Cheating in the Pandemic Era

Online and in-person classes are not created equal. In the pre-pandemic era, classes that were offered online respected this truth. But in the eleventh-hour scramble to convert on-campus classes for a remote classroom, some issues fell through the cracks – namely exams. Institutions across the world recorded a staggering increase in the occurrence of cheating when classes went online. This is due to a host of reasons:

  • Students were under dramatically more stress when making the switch online. From connectivity challenges to privacy concerns to general pandemic-related worries, students were bringing a lot of baggage to the classroom.
  • Ambiguity exists in some cases as to what was permissible in an exam setting. With students accustomed to utilizing the internet as a resource, it was not always clearly defined what tools, if any, were at the student's disposal.
  • Opportunities to cheat were simply much more prevalent than in the classroom. Students took to social media and file-sharing platforms to help each other pass exams, and that contributed to quadruple the frequency of alleged cheating infractions in some areas of the world.

The Exam Reboot

The latest exploration in anti-cheating technology is a robot that writes custom exams for test-takers. A UK university is trialing the bespoke A.I. software to generate unique datasets for each student sitting an exam. The thought is that a custom exam for each student in a class would prevent students who have taken the test from widely sharing the exam questions and answers with the remaining students who have not.

There are many potential questions that must be answered in order to protect student rights. Specifically – how can it be validated that all versions of the exam are equally challenging? What prevents the software from drafting versions of the test that are markedly more difficult than others?

The best-case scenario for students is a fundamental shift in how knowledge is assessed. Some professors are choosing to proctor short oral exams to verify students' learning, while others are moving away from high-stakes exams to more regular tests and quizzes.

In any case, student life today looks dramatically different than it did a few years ago. Students must continue to advocate for their own well-being and fair treatment in the academic arena. Students also have an ally in Joseph D. Lento and the team at the Lento Law Firm. Reach out at 888-535-3686 to discuss your academic integrity challenges in the face of online learning.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.