Everything You Need to Know About Probable New Title IX Czar Catherine Lhamon - Part 2

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Sep 02, 2021 | 0 Comments


President Joe Biden's decision to nominate controversial Obama Administration assistant secretary for civil rights Catherine Lhamon to return to her old post as de facto Title IX czar is definitely one to watch. Whether the full Senate consents to Lhamon's appointment has clear policy implications. While Lhamon's confirmation proceeds in at least some doubt, after a Senate committee deadlocked on her fitness, consider what Lhamon's nomination and probable return as Title IX czar means for students facing Title IX enforcement at the nation's colleges and universities.

First Steps Toward Renewed Enforcement

Lhamon's nomination is clearly another salvo in the Biden Administration's Title IX agenda. The Biden Administration has already taken swift action to announce and advance that Title IX agenda. That agenda is clearly to overturn the Trump/DeVos Title IX protective regulations and to restore the Obama Administration's aggressive Title IX enforcement. Rolling back Trump Administration protective regulations may take years. It took Secretary DeVos nearly all of Trump's full four-year term to promulgate those regulations. So Biden's Department of Education instead issued an extraordinary question and answer document encouraging schools to re-interpret Title IX for renewed enforcement that skirts or minimizes the still-current protective measures.

Regulatory Reforms Likely to Follow

The Biden Administration's extraordinary question-and-answer document is very likely nominee Lhamon's blueprint for coming new Title IX regulations, even if those regulations take years to promulgate. Prominent and influential higher education sources, like the Chronicle of Higher Education, read the Biden Q&A document as urging colleges and universities to renew and broaden enforcement actions against students accused of sexual misconduct. For instance, the Q&A document urges schools to:

  • apply the school's own broad definition of sexual misconduct rather than the narrower Title IX definition;
  • charge students with sexual misconduct for off-campus behavior;
  • pursue disciplinary charges without any complainant;
  • bar accused students from campus during investigation;
  • finish proceedings in just sixty days or less, rushing the process.

As controversial and aggressive as nominee Lhamon has been, she may also pursue bigger reforms than those the Biden Administration urged in its end-run Q&A document. Indeed, the two DeVos measures that have most protected students falsely accused of Title IX sexual misconduct, (1) consideration only of live testimony at the hearing and (2) attorney cross-examination of those live witnesses, are surely two other measures at greatest risk of elimination under Lhamon.

What Reforms May Mean for the Accused Student

These are just a few of the reforms that students should expect to see if nominee Lhamon returns to her old Title IX czar post. All of them place falsely accused students at significantly greater risk of responsibility for sexual misconduct they did not commit. Broader sexual misconduct definitions are so vague that they potentially implicate conduct many students would not see as harmful or improper. Discipline for off-campus conduct and discipline without a complaining witness multiply the risks. Removing the accused student from campus during investigation keeps the student from gathering evidence and continuing studies. Rushing the whole process can leave an accused student unprepared to respond to false charges. And if accused students lose the right to confront and cross-examine witnesses, they will have lost essential tools of justice.

Retain a National Title IX Defense Attorney

The Biden Administration's nomination of the controversial Obama Administration Title IX czar Catherine Lhamon shows the prevailing winds that college and university students falsely accused of sexual misconduct face. Defending and defeating sexual misconduct charges on a college or university campus can be an uphill battle. Sexual misconduct is also a charge that can ruin an education and the career that would follow it.

If you face Title IX or other sexual misconduct charges, national Title IX defense attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm are ready for your aggressive and effective defense. With the right representation, you can successfully defend and defeat false, unfair, or exaggerated sexual misconduct charges. Keep your school from rushing your proceeding to a false and damaging conclusion. Remember what you have at stake in your education. Call 888-535-3686 to schedule a Lento Law Firm consultation, or use the online service.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.