Blog

Everything You Need to Know About Probable New Title IX Czar Catherine Lhamon

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 30, 2021 | 0 Comments

PART ONE

President Joe Biden recently nominated the former Obama Administration assistant secretary for civil rights Catherine Lhamon to return to her old Department of Education post as de facto Title IX czar. Lhamon's nomination raises significant issues. Will she win Senate consent to return to her old Title IX czar post? What has made her nomination so controversial? And if nominee Lhamon returns as Title IX czar, what will her return mean for students facing Title IX enforcement at the nation's colleges and universities?

A Nomination Battle

Nominee Lhamon hasn't yet won the necessary Senate consent. Instead, her record of controversial actions in her Obama Administration role polarized the ordinarily compliant, Democratic-led Senate. Lhamon's nomination won only a tie 11-11 party-line vote in the Senate's Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Democrats hold only the slimmest control of the full Senate, with Democrat Vice President Harris breaking ties between the evenly divided senators. That even division leaves committees with equal numbers of senators from each party. Hence Lhamon's tie vote in the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Not even Republican fence-sitting Senators Mitt Romney, Susan Collins, and Lisa Murkowski, all members of the deadlocked Committee, were willing to cross party lines.

And the Winner Is ...

Time will soon tell whether nominee Lhamon wins her return as Title IX czar, with full Senate consent. Senate Majority Leader Schumer, a Democrat, can discharge Lhamon's nomination from the deadlocked Committee, bringing her nomination to the full Senate. Full Senate consent is frankly probable because of effective Democratic Senate control. If the full chamber deadlocks 50-50, then Vice President Harris will certainly break the tie in nominee Lhamon's favor. That's how Senate politics work. Democrats need only hold their party line, at which they have been quite good on nearly all issues, for nominee Lhamon to return to her former Title IX czar post. But in politics, few things are assured, few things cast in stone. Presidents have at times withdrawn controversial nominations in political trade to win higher priority battles. President Biden might in the future need or want a favorable vote from Republican Senators Romney, Collins, or Murkowski on, say, a Supreme Court nominee. Expect Lhamon to return as Title IX czar, but don't bet the farm on it.

A Controversial Record

Nominee Lhamon undoubtedly faces such resistance because of her controversial record of Obama Administration Title IX enforcement. Lhamon led the Obama Administration's use of informal guidance to reduce or eliminate protective procedures for college students falsely accused of Title IX sexual harassment or violence. Trump Administration Education Secretary Betsy DeVos championed new Title IX regulations that re-balanced both sides' protective rights. For best example, under the DeVos regulations, both accuser and accused may cross-examine witnesses who must appear at the formal hearing.

Yet Lhamon was having none of it. A Wall Street Journal report on Lhamon's recent nomination quotes Lhamon as calling the DeVos measures a return “to the bad old days, that predate my birth, when it was permissible to rape and sexually harass students with impunity.” That's controversial language, especially considering that federal courts had in several cases found due process violations under the Obama guidance while, on the other hand, upheld the rebalanced new DeVos measures. For political junkies, Lhamon's controversial nomination is a bit of a barn burner. But it also has significant policy implications.

If you face Title IX or other sexual misconduct charges, national Title IX defense attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm are ready for your aggressive and effective defense. With the right representation, you can successfully defend and defeat false, unfair, or exaggerated sexual misconduct charges. Keep your school from rushing your proceeding to a false and damaging conclusion. Remember what you have at stake in your education. Call 888-535-3686 to schedule a Lento Law Firm consultation, or use the online service.

Stay tuned for part two of this story.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu