Distinctions Between the Title IX Investigation Process and Criminal Procedures

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | May 29, 2018 | 0 Comments

Alleged victims of sexual assault on school campuses are allowed the option of pursuing resolution through a Title IX administrative complaint process or a criminal process through local law enforcement, or both. Although the criminal process route is rarely chosen, it's important for student respondents and alleged victims to understand the differences between these two distinct procedures. The consequences, methods, and practices exhibited in these systems vary, and entail separate components and thereafter, results.

Regardless of the process, an alleged victim chooses for resolution, it is important to review the specifics of your case with a Title IX attorney. For the purposes of this article, I will provide a general review of the key differences between the Title IX process and a criminal procedure:

Goals: The outcome of a criminal procedure is dictated by a judge or jury's verdict of a defendant's guilt or innocence. If found guilty, the goal of this procedure is to safeguard the public and to punish defendants who violate criminal law. In college settings, the priorities of school authorities include educating the public about misconduct, keeping each member of the campus community safe, and maintaining a safe environment. This is why preventative measures, like rearranged housing options, and no contact orders are almost always ordered in school complaints, but defendants are allowed to confront their accuser during criminal processes.

Investigations: A criminal investigation is conducted by police and a local law enforcement agency. These authorities have been professionally trained to investigate the sensitive and complex nature of sexual assault crimes. Investigations in schools, on the other hand, are conducted by individuals employed by the college or university. They too have been trained, but not as extensively as official crime investigators.

Privacy: Criminal trials are open to the public. People can even sit in on a case if they wish to. Disciplinary proceedings are kept as private as possible. The names of the parties and witnesses involved are kept confidential throughout the entire process unless a school considers it necessary to reveal an identity for the safety of the campus community.

The standard of evidence: In criminal trials, the standard known as “beyond a reasonable doubt” is applied to criminal matters. This means that the prosecution is responsible for proving that a violation of criminal law occurred beyond a reasonable doubt, based on the evidence. A lesser standard, known as the “preponderance of evidence” is often applied to Title IX procedures. This means that it must be proven that a student respondent more likely than not committed a violation for a “responsible” determination.

Since the standards for pursuing and completing criminal investigations are vastly different from those used in Title IX investigations, the termination of a criminal investigation without an arrest, charge, or conviction will not affect the Title IX resolution process.

Title IX Attorney Helping Clients Nationwide

A student respondent may be forced to undergo one of these processes or both. The complexities of both of these systems require the help of a skilled Title IX attorney. Joseph D. Lento has extensive experience helping students nationwide overcome Title IX actions, he can do the same for you. Contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.