Court Considers Sanctioning Law Firm for Discovery Practices in Title IX Case

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jun 19, 2019 | 0 Comments

In yet another instance of the complications created by the Title IX framework, a federal district court judge in Texas is thinking about sanctioning a Philadelphia law firm for failing to disclose evidence in a pending Title IX claim against Baylor University. The situation reveals the conflict of interest that arises when schools pay lawyers to conduct Title IX investigations.

Baylor University Hires Law Firm to Investigate its Title IX System

Three years ago, 15 former students from Baylor University sued the school for failing to adequately respond to their claims that they were sexually assaulted. Their Title IX claim was filed in the federal district court for the Western District of Texas, where it went before Judge Robert Pitman.

Baylor University had hired a Philadelphia-based law firm, Pepper Hamilton, to investigate its Title IX process. That investigation concluded that there was a “fundamental failure” in how Baylor University handed sexual assault allegations. A summary of the report was released by the Baylor Board of Regents. However, the full report was never disclosed.

Court Considering Sanctions for Law Firm for Discovery Issues

The full report of the investigation has now become a huge part of the Title IX case against the school.

Lawyers for the women who made the sexual assault allegations have repeatedly asked for the report. The court has ruled that the full report needs to be made available to the plaintiffs. However, Baylor University and Pepper Hamilton have claimed that there was no final report of its investigation. Attorneys for the plaintiffs claim that this is incorrect, as emails that have been made available mention a final report.

The judge on the case has become so annoyed that he has scheduled a hearing to talk about sanctioning the college and the law firm for abusing the discovery process.

Rampant Conflicts of Interest in Title IX Investigations

The whole situation shines the limelight on one of the most overlooked, but also one of the most practically important, problems of Title IX investigations: They are rife with conflicts of interest and the illusion of bias.

Many outside consultants who conduct Title IX investigations are paid by the school that is being investigated. The benefit of the doubt will always go to the person cutting the check, so these investigations tend to tilt towards exonerating the school.

When it doesn't, and the investigation finds “fundamental failures” like this one did, it raises alarm: Things were so bad with the Title IX process that the investigator couldn't ignore the extent of the problem. However, it also raises a serious problem: Now the only people with the full report are the investigator, who was paid by the school, and the school, itself. Not only is it up to the plaintiffs to uncover the report in the discovery process, but the college has plenty of incentive to cover it up. After all, the school's federal funding is at stake.

Even when colleges and the investigators play by the rules, they cannot get rid of that lingering doubt that they are hiding something, given the strong incentive they have to cover up the results of the investigation.

Joseph D. Lento: A National Title IX Advisor

Joseph D. Lento is a national Title IX advisorContact him online or call his law office at (888) 535-3686 if you have been accused of a Title IX violation.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.