Blog

Defamation Liability for Testimony in a Title IX Proceeding – Part 1

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 10, 2022 | 0 Comments

Title IX charges, even when outright false and based instead only on the accuser's deliberate lying, can damage the accused student's reputation, and cost the student much distress and disruption. A student whom a college or university accuses of Title IX sexual misconduct may wonder what happens to an accuser who is out-and-out lying. Can the accused student hold the lying accuser liable for defamation? Could the accused student make the lying accuser pay money, compensating for the accused student's reputational and other harm? The answer isn't as clear as you might think. Defamation liability relating to a Title IX proceeding can depend on several factors. If you face false Title IX misconduct charges and want to know your recovery rights, retain premier Title IX defense attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm. Help is available to you now.

The Law of Defamation

Defamation (known as slander in its oral form and libel in its written form) is a civil court action for damages. To make a monetary recovery for defamation, the accused student would have to show that the accuser spoke or wrote false, reputation-lowering allegations about the accused student. False Title IX allegations that the accused student had committed a sexual crime or other sexual misconduct could, in theory, support a defamation claim. But defamation law protects against false allegations made in the course of a judicial proceeding. Otherwise, defamation liability might discourage parties and witnesses from making allegations in court proceedings. Parties and witnesses testifying in court proceedings generally have absolute immunity from defamation liability. And some states extend absolute immunity to quasi-judicial proceedings, listing factors for what qualifies as quasi-judicial. If absolute immunity applies in Title IX proceedings, then falsely accused students may be without a defamation remedy.

Whether a Title IX Proceeding Offers Immunity

But that's the big absolute-immunity question: is a Title IX proceeding, especially one at a private rather than public college or university, equivalent to a judicial proceeding? The very recent case of Khan v Yale University provides the perfect example. In that case, the federal court certified to the state court the question of whether the accuser student should have absolute immunity from the accused student's defamation claim for what the accused student claimed were false rape allegations made in Yale University's Title IX proceeding. Is a private college or university Title IX proceeding quasi-judicial, affording the lying accuser absolute immunity? The Khan v Yale University case recognized that some states' laws do not extend absolute immunity to protect defamation made in private school Title IX proceedings. But the federal court found that Connecticut law was unclear on the issue. It thus asked the Connecticut Supreme Court to answer that question.

Retain Skilled Attorney Representation

Time will tell what answer the Connecticut Supreme Court gives to whether that state's law offers absolute immunity to lying Title IX misconduct accusers. Yet no matter how Connecticut treats the immunity question, other states will treat the question differently. And defamation liability may still exist for false statements the accuser made outside of the Title IX proceeding. If you face false Title IX charges that you expect to defeat and for which you wish to recover money damages in defamation, retain a skilled and experienced Title IX defense attorney to assist you. Premier college misconduct defense attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm are available for your representation relating to Title IX charges, including investigating your recovery rights. Call 888-535-3686 or go online now.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu