Blog

Dartmouth Apologizes, Drops Cheating Charges Against Med Students (Part II)

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jan 12, 2022 | 0 Comments

In Part I, we discussed the case of 10 medical students at Dartmouth who were charged by the university for having inappropriately used online learning resources during an exam. The students were later exonerated, but the injustice remains a mar on the med school's record. It also raises a number of thorny issues about the role of technology in academic integrity.

What are the implications of Dartmouth's accusations that medical school students cheated during online exams?

Flawed Methodology

As damaging as it could have been to the students' futures, the cheating scandal—or, rather, the accusation-of-cheating scandal—does draw much-needed attention to the issue of technology and its flaws. One of the major issues in the Dartmouth story is the school's use of Canvas, the online course management system, to track student activity in ways that some critics are calling dubiously ethical (and others are calling downright unethical).

One such way was relying on Canvas as forensic technology, a purpose for which it wasn't designed and isn't meant. Dartmouth used the system to investigate the students' activity after the fact. Even worse, say some academic integrity experts, they did so without the medical scholars' knowledge.

Upon learning that Dartmouth was pointing fingers at Canvas, several of the medical students whose honor was under the proverbial microscope protested that their devices would automatically and routinely “ping” to the LMS, without their having even accessed the software, let alone actively used it.

Implications for Academic Integrity in Our Post-COVID World

Others are calling to task the administrators who so avidly pursued the indictment of student integrity, saying that the institution, which was founded in 1769, has done 21st Century academia a disservice. Dartmouth relied heavily on technological evidence, they claimed that this evidence was unimpeachable, and, adding insult to injury, they actively discouraged the usual rigors of due process in student honor code cases. This has frightening implications for post-pandemic academic protocols.

Of course, Dartmouth is only one of hundreds of institutions of higher learning around the globe that has necessarily adopted additional technological tools in the wake of the coronavirus. These tools, and similar ones used by nearly every industry, have allowed life in pandemic times to remain as close to normal as possible.

Naturally, no one can expect colleges not to track students' activities during remote learning. But is the university itself a victim of our new normal's necessary evils? Or has it hastened us unwittingly toward a terrifying day when we can no longer distinguish between the human element and the one powered by bits and bytes?

In Uncertain Times, We Stand Strong

Honor code defense and academic integrity issues are our meat and potatoes here at The Lento Law Firm. We rely on both the best of technological assistance and the passion—and compassion—of the human heart when we defend students against unfair allegations of cheating, code of conduct violations, sexual misconduct, or other misdeeds. Contact us to learn more about how we can help you. Call (888)535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu