Blog

Court Vindicates New Title IX Regulations in Sexual-Assault Cases

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jun 10, 2020 | 0 Comments

Over the last decade, one of the most controversial topics in higher education has been Title IX and schools' obligations under the legislation. Title IX is a federal civil right law passed as part of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.S.C. §1681 et seq. The law prohibits sex discrimination for federally funded schools in things like admissions, athletics, and employment. Title IX states:

No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.

The statute itself is brief, but the U.S. Department of Education also promulgates regulations that guide kindergarten through grade 12 schools and colleges and universities that accept federal funding. Over the years, regulations and court cases have shaped schools' obligations under the law, which also covers sexual assault and harassment. Until recently, if schools knew, or reasonably should have known about an incident of sexual assault, they were required to investigate and remediate the situation.

Old Title IX Regulations Weren't Always Fair

While schools may be well-intentioned, regulations handed down in 2011 worked more in favor of students who complained about an alleged sexual assault rather than those accused. In the past, students were expelled or suspended without a hearing reviewing the case against them. While many courts agree that having schools handle sexual misconduct cases, rather than the criminal justice system, is the best approach, this also implies that schools are offering the same due process rights provided by courts. This hasn’t been the case. Since 2011, more than 550 students have filed suit against their colleges, arguing that the educational institutions failed to offer them the due process required under the law in sexual misconduct cases.

In May of this year, the U.S. Department of Education issued new guidance regarding Title IX, changing the standard for school involvement in sexual misconduct cases, and changing the required due process schools must provide. The new regulations offer more due process to both the complainants and the accused in sexual misconduct claims, including:

· An express presumption of innocence;

· Live hearings and cross-examination of witnesses by an attorney or advisor;

· Access to evidence and sufficient time to prepare for interviews and a hearing;

· Impartial investigators and decision-makers; and

· An objective evaluation of all relevant evidence.

Fairer Due Process Procedures Prevail

In a groundbreaking new ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit issued an opinion in the first significant court ruling since the U.S. Department of Education issued the new regulations. The court ruled that if a private university promises students a fair process in sexual misconduct cases, it must provide students with a live hearing to determine the matter and offer the complainant and respondent the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses through an attorney or advocate. The court noted that while the school does act in an “educational” rather than criminal court capacity, the alleged criminal activity requires more basic procedural protections for the respondent. Given the life-altering consequences of a guilty finding, ensuring due process offers the surest path to fairness.

Nationwide Title IX Defense

Mr. Lento has handled Title IX cases at countless colleges and universities across the country and he can put his experience and expertise to work for you.  If someone has charged you or a loved one with a Title IX sexual misconduct charge, contact attorney Joseph Lento as soon as possible at 888-535-3686 or through his online form.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience passionately fighting for the futures of his clients. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at universities and colleges across the United States while concurrently fighting in criminal courtrooms in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, and New Jersey. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand universities and colleges across the United States. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website.  In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County.  In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County,  In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties.  Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law.  The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship.  The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu