Blog

Court Rules That Texas Christian University (TCU) Violated Due Process for Student Accused of Sexual Misconduct

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Jan 26, 2023 | 0 Comments

A judge in the United States District Court Northern District of Texas- Fort Worth Division has issued a de facto ruling that Texas Christian University (TCU) violated a male student's right to due process.

The story highlights how, when students face allegations of sexual misconduct, they must hire an experienced attorney-advisor to defend them—because, too often, schools side with the accuser regardless of the weight of the evidence.

The Backstory

A male TCU student (John Doe) was in a romantic relationship in high school and carried on that relationship when he became a freshman at TCU, and his female partner (Jane Doe) was a senior in high school. One year later, Jane Doe enrolled at TCU, and the pair continued a sexual relationship but were not formally dating.

Jane Doe eventually accused John Doe of two instances of sexual assault, reporting the alleged violations to TCU's Title IX Office. These allegations were the basis for the violation of rights to follow.

The Violation of the Student's Rights

TCU's Title IX Office completed a hasty Title IX proceeding and found John Doe responsible for one of the two allegations of sexual misconduct. John Doe appealed, claiming that:

  1. TCU could not have reasonably found him responsible for one allegation of sexual misconduct but not the other, as both allegations were based on the same evidence
  2. TCU did not reach the correct conclusion based on the facts of the case

Furthermore, John Doe's post-appeal lawsuit actually alleges that he was discriminated against on the basis of gender or sex.

The Judge's Ruling

TCU was seeking a Summary Judgment of John Doe's lawsuit. That is, the school was moving for the judge to dismiss the case before it proceeded further toward trial.

The judge denied TCU's motion for Summary Judgment, explaining that John Doe had grounds for “genuine dispute as to any material fact” and that these grounds make John Doe “ “entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”

The judge found a reasonable basis to support the plaintiff's claim that TCU:

  1. Enforced its ruling selectively, using the same supporting evidence to reach two opposite conclusions
  2. Engaged in procedural errors in adjudicating the allegations of sexual misconduct against John Doe
  3. Showed gender bias through statements, and that this bias may have affected the outcome of Title IX proceedings

The judge's ruling is an indictment of the integrity of TCU's Title IX procedures.

Don't Let Your School Violate Your Rights—Hire a National Education Attorney-Advisor From the Lento Law Firm

The TCU case shows the high cost of sexual misconduct accusations. When schools like Texas Christian University fail to provide the due process that the accused are entitled to, a mere accusation can be equivalent to a judgment of responsibility.

It is vital that anyone accused of sexual misconduct retain an experienced National Education Attorney-Advisor. The Lento Law Firm Team will ensure that your school honors your rights, and we will fight to clear your name and protect your future. Call 888.535.3686 now.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu