Why is a College Being Accused of Covering Up Evidence to Help Someone Accused of Sexual Misconduct?

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Mar 10, 2020 | 0 Comments

A federal lawsuit has a new, but far from surprising, take on sexual misconduct allegations in violation of Title IX: An investigating police officer claims that he was retaliated against for blowing the whistle on a college's attempt to cover up wrongdoing in an attempt to preserve its reputation.

It flies in the face of the rule that schools bend over backward to help the alleged victim, but it makes sense as soon as you recall that the accused was a faculty member.

Police Officer Suspended for Blowing the Whistle on Title IX Allegations

The lawsuit was filed by a campus police officer at the University of Michigan-Dearborn. The officer, who has 22 years of experience in the Detroit police force, including two years spent investigating sex crimes, said that the story began with a sexual assault allegation by a female student against a male lecturer at the college.

On March 1, 2019, the student went to the local hospital claiming that she had been sexually assaulted. A different campus police officer took her initial report, but the interim police chief at UM-Dearborn told the police officer filing the lawsuit not to take the victim's statement as “it could come back to haunt us in court.”

The chief sent another officer to interview the lecturer… in his home and off the record, in violation of protocol. During the interview, the lecturer admitted having sex with the student. He also emailed the student, saying that she now knew what she could do to raise her grade. He would later resign without repercussion and take a job at another school. According to the lawsuit, the campus police department would go on to alter some paperwork to make it seem as if the prosecutor's office had refused to press charges when the case had actually never been sent.

The police officer complained about how the case was handled to his superiors, the school's human resources department, the school board, and eventually took it to the press. He was then suspended.

He filed a lawsuit, claiming that his suspension was because he blew the whistle on misconduct, making him entitled to protection from retaliation.

The Takeaway: Schools Look Out for Themselves in Title IX Cases

We see this kind of wrongdoing consistently from another perspective when schools bend over backward to help students accusing other students of sexual misconduct. In those cases, schools want to make it clear that they care about victim's rights in order to protect their federal funding under Title IX. They throw accused students under the bus by denying them the ability to defend themselves in as many ways as possible.

When the accused party is a staffer, though, schools can seem to lean heavily in the other direction. It's not because they suddenly want to protect due process rights for the accused – it's because their reputation is on the line and they want to protect it. They would look bad if a faculty member was discovered to be a sexual predator.

Students who have been accused of misconduct and who claim that they are not getting the opportunity to defend themselves are often criticized with examples of schools sticking with accused staffers. The game is different in those cases, though. The school's interests are on the other side.

Title IX Defense Lawyer Joseph D. Lento

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and national Title IX advisor. Call his law office at (888) 535-3686 or contact him online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.