College Academic Misconduct – Idaho State University

College and university students must adhere to their school's academic integrity rules to maintain their good standing and continuous progress toward a degree. Institutions of higher education like Idaho State University utilize academic regulations to reinforce their public reputations as centers of scholastic success and to remain eligible for federal funding. Violating academic rules is no small matter and frequently results in a student's downfall.

Like other colleges and universities, Idaho State University will address academic misconduct and poor classroom performance with academic sanctions and more severe punishments for subsequent infractions. It's terrible for parents to watch their student children rushed through a hasty grievance process that puts their future at risk. They may often believe there's nothing they can do besides waiting for the consequences, but there is help at hand.

Students and their supportive parents have the opportunity to retain professional assistance to guide them through these daunting matters. Academic misconduct sanctions will stick with students past their college days, so ensuring a solid defense is vital. Skilled student defense advisor Joseph D. Lento has paramount experience defending the rights of young students against harsh school disciplinary boards.

Idaho State University Academic Standards

Students enrolled in Idaho State University must abide by progression standards set by the school faculty, which are detailed in the Student Handbook. To remain in good standing, students must maintain a cumulative grade point average (GPA) of at least 2.0 (3.0 for graduate students), complete 67 percent of attempted courses, and graduate within 150 percent of the published degree timeframe. Failure to meet these prerequisites will garner a formal academic warning. The student will be subject to academic probation if they don't raise their GPA or the other requirements are not met in the following semesters.

Idaho State University students may only remain in school on academic probation for one semester until the administration pursues academic misconduct charges. Students may challenge the university's decision and be granted a hearing by the school's Appeal Committee if:

  • A student's academic success plan defines clear goals and timeframes for their path toward good standing
  • A student's extenuating circumstances can be demonstrated

A student defense advisor can help students in this situation and ensure they do everything possible to remain intact with the university. Nevertheless, students may find themselves in trouble for other academic reasons.

Academic Misconduct at Idaho State University

Academic dishonesty in any form is unacceptable at Idaho State University. The school specifies the following as violations of their Academic Integrity and Dishonesty Policy:

  1. Cheating: Giving, seeking, or obtaining unauthorized assistance on any assignment, exam, or educational project to gain an academic advantage.
  2. Plagiarism: Using another person's ideas, writings, or work, in whole or in part, to complete an academic assignment without attributions.

Idaho State University instructors are also encouraged to draft specific guidelines in their course syllabi to address academic misconduct in their evaluation methods. Moreover, the university states that students must not assume that any "collaborative learning activities" are authorized unless explained by their instructor or in their course syllabus.

Informal Resolution for Academic Misconduct

If an instructor or other campus member is aware of any instance of academic misconduct, the implementation of the university's Academic Dishonesty Policy is supervised by the Department of Academic Affairs. Instructors are responsible for addressing alleged incidents, but academic deans will act as appellate officers if a student challenges the instructor's findings and subsequent punishments.

Students will be given at least three school days to set a meeting with the instructor to discuss the allegations. If the instructor concludes that academic dishonesty has occurred, they must inform the accused student in writing within ten school days following the face-to-face meeting, including any sanctions imposed.

Sanctions levied by instructors may only be academic in nature. They include:

  • Extra or alternative assignments
  • Failing or reduced grade on the assignment
  • Failing or reduced grade in the course

Appeals may be filed in writing to the dean of the course or college in which the course is offered within 15 business days following the instructor's final decision. The hearing will include the instructor, the student, the chairperson of the instructor's academic department, the chairperson of the student's academic major department, and the college dean.

Within five business days after the hearing, the dean shall issue a determination of responsibility based upon a preponderance of the evidence standard. Punishments may be affirmed or amended but may not result in a separation from studies.

Formal Grievance Process for Academic Misconduct

If a student challenges the informal process conducted by the instructor or the alleged misconduct is severe, the Academic Dishonesty Board will set a date for a formal hearing. Students will have "sufficient time" to review all evidence collected by the school administration.

Accused students may choose one of the following to accompany them to the hearing:

  • An enrolled student
  • Faculty member
  • Staff member

However, the selected person may not directly participate in the hearing and may act only in an advisory capacity. Nevertheless, the accused student will witness the instructor's testimony regarding the academic misconduct.

Following the hearing, the Board will vote on whether to suspend or expel the student or dismiss the charges based on a majority vote. Appeals may be sought following the above process. All decisions from the dean's office are final.

How Joseph D. Lento Can Help You Defeat Academic Misconduct Allegations

Unfortunately, appealing disciplinary action can be intimidating given the vague requirements and how the process unfolds. Your need for a student defense advisor cannot be more apparent.

Joseph D. Lento is an expert student defense advisor, and his team at the Lento Law Firm has handled academic misconduct matters involving students at hundreds of colleges and universities across the U.S. They have maintained beneficial relationships with schools' internal Office of General Counsel (OGC) in the effort to broker beneficial resolutions on behalf of their student clients.

The Lento Law Firm student defense team understands how to help school administration officials see the positive options to serve the student and them far better than suspension, expulsion, or other severe sanctions. For expert advice, call 888-535-3686 to discuss how your defense can be bolstered or use the online consultation form.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.