Blog

Cheating Detection, Part 2

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 27, 2021 | 0 Comments

Just in case you missed part 1 of this post, take a look at this article in the Washington Post.

The article reports on the “revolt” against online proctoring services that are increasingly used to monitor remote testing. In part 1, we recapped how these services work and who has been speaking out against them. In part 2, we will look at how the services can exacerbate inequities in education.

Disabled

These services make little accommodation for students living with disabilities. This brave new world of online testing has grown so fast that it has not taken into account that disabilities can manifest in behaviors that will flag as suspicious. Proctorio failed an accessibility audit at the University of Colorado Boulder. That school is supposed to arrange an alternative when Proctorio won't work for a student, but how is a test-taker supposed to know which disability-related behaviors will be deemed suspicious? Will it be too late when they're accused of cheating? The National Disabled Law Students Association surveyed online test-takers and found hundreds scared of academic misconduct charges as a result of disability.

Discriminated

The proctoring services also fall flat when it comes to minority students. The Post chronicles how, “Students with dark skin have shined bright lights at their face, worrying the systems wouldn’t recognize them.

Disenfranchised

Another alarming feature of the online proctoring services is their opacity. What information are they keeping about students? If asked, what information will they reveal? Proctorio rates test-takers with a secret (from the student) “suspicion level” when a student’s behavior differs from their peers. How long will that “suspicion level” follow a student, and how will it be used? Will it affect college admissions? Employment opportunities? This is on top of the harm even an accusation of cheating can cause a student. Meanwhile, colleges have yet to update their policies to cover suspected online cheating. In the absence of policies tailored for this new testing paradigm, it is a student's right to due process that may suffer. A lack of formal procedures means students are subject to uneven application of standards between teachers and unregulated informal adjudication.

Charged

The Post acknowledges that “to defend their integrity, students may have to prove the high-tech cheating detective somehow got it wrong.” But they don't have to do it alone. Joseph Lento is an attorney advisor with experience defending students accused of academic misconduct. If you're facing charges, let him help you ensure your rights. When you're accused of online cheating, it's time to ask questions--don't try to defend yourself; attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm will take care of that. Ask the administration for the evidence. Find out what platform the school is using and what level/features were in use during the test. Get copies of the school's academic misconduct policy. And call the Lento Law Firm at 888-535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu