Blog

Cheating Detection, Part 1

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Apr 26, 2021 | 0 Comments

With the increasing reliance on remote learning, online proctoring services have mushroomed. While these services seem like a good idea on the surface, there are several pitfalls that can cause test takers serious harm. Students have been posting about their experiences, and regional news sources and other outlets have picked up their stories. As the backlash grows, the national media is increasingly taking note.

How They Work

We've written extensively about some of the biggest names in online proctoring. For more detailed info on each, see our posts on:

Generally, though, they all work about the same. They all use artificial intelligence software to identify suspected incidents of cheating. The software does this by recording the microphone, camera, and desktop of the test taker's computer. The software “flag[s] students for any ‘abnormal’ head movement, mouse movement, eye wandering, computer window resizing, tab opening, scrolling, clicking, typing, and copies and pastes.

Who's Speaking Out

While students have been protesting these invasive online proctoring companies from the beginning, others are also speaking up, which likely caught the Times' attention. Some teachers have taken their students' concerns to heart and are standing up to these companies. A veteran teacher and founder of Hybrid Pedagogy, an academic journal, Jesse Stommel has been public in his debates with the head of Proctorio, one of the largest remote testing companies. State lawmakers in New York have spoken out about the “profound lack of decency” found in this kind of testing. Even the Federal government is asking questions. According to Vox.com, “Several US senators have also recently written to the companies producing these tools to request more information about privacy, bias, and accessibility concerns raised by their tools.

Why the Rage

Students, teachers, and lawmakers are enraged at the trauma these tests are causing test-takers. Test-takers have to keep hands, face, and desk contents in view of the camera at all times. They have to show the camera the entire room and everything they will have on their desk. In Ontario, Wilfrid Laurier University requires student going to the bathroom to “shout into the microphone: ‘I need to go to the washroom and will come back quickly.'” Some tests don't allow even that. One student sitting for the New York Bar exam reported urinating in a metal pot while sitting at their desk because they couldn't leave the camera's frame. And they aren't the only ones.

The rage only grows when company officials like Nici Sandberg, spokesperson for ExamSoft, respond with tone-deaf and heartless comments. She commented that students know “the format and parameters of the exams well ahead of time” and that leaving camera-view would still be an “integrity breach.” The Post sums up all of this by asking, “Is stopping a few cheaters worth the price of treating every student like a fraud?

Accused?

If you're accused as a “fraud” or of any other academic misconduct, there a few things you should and should not do:

  • Don't try to defend yourself; let Joe Lento take care of that
  • Do find out exactly what's alleged
  • Do get copies of the evidence
  • Do find out what the institutional policy is for academic misconduct, specifically online misconduct
  • Do find out what testing software was used, what level, and what features were enabled

Interested in learning more? Go to part 2 of this discussion of the Post's article, and call attorney Joseph D. Lento and the Lento Law Firm at 888-535-3686 if you need help.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!

footer-2.jpg

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu