Complainants and Respondents Cite Biased Hearing Officers As A Serious Concern

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 28, 2018 | 0 Comments

Title IX of the Education Amendments is a gender discrimination law that requires colleges to internally adjudicate claims of sexual assault and harassment on campus. The Department of Education provides clear guidelines for how these matters are to be resolved, serving as a blueprint to maintain a sense of uniformity amongst federally funded institutions. But in many aspects of the process, schools are rendered a great deal of flexibility.

Whom institutions choose to oversee sexual misconduct hearings is a crucial decision. And it's one that people who bring charges (complainants) and people who respond to them (respondents) claim that many schools are getting wrong. Whether distinct employees are designated to the task, or outside judges and mediators are appointed, students involved in the process continue to report that impartiality is rampant in hearing decisions.

Years back, two football players sued the University of Maine after being found responsible for sexual misconduct. The lawsuit detailed that the chair of the hearing committee was biased because she dedicated much of her free time serving on a Rape Response board. The judge, however, disagreed, writing that the chairman is entitled to a presumption of honesty and integrity in her role, despite how she spends her off time. This sentiment has been reflected across the board in hundreds of lawsuits. Many of the students' concerns are being written off as speculation in the eyes of the courts and institutions.

Realistically, you can't put complex, perceptive human beings into these positions and expect them to always maintain complete objectivity. In fact, it's impossible. We all have biases. Underestimating people's ability to give in to bias - whether consciously or subconsciously - will greatly compromise integrity in the process. But what distinguishes responsible hearing officers or panel members from the others is the ability to recognize and understand what biases they have, and refuse to let them impact investigations and resolutions.

Recognizing, neutralizing and possibly overcoming bias in Title IX matters starts at the institution. Only when schools make efforts to employ people who have a developed sense of cultural competency, humility, and empathy, will we see a drastic increase in integrity. Some schools have begun thoroughly examining their Title IX investigation and hearing processes to make better hearing decisions. But until mechanisms are put in place to ensure better decisions are made, we will continue to see lawsuits in response to inequitable processes increase.

Nationwide Title IX Advisor

The only way to make sure your voice is heard and your rights are upheld is to retain a student defense attorney. For respondents, especially, the assistance of an attorney advisor is invaluable in the Title IX process. National Title IX attorney Joseph D. Lento has the skill, experience, and expertise to help you preserve your entitled rights under Title IX and your school's policy. For a case evaluation or more information about his representation, contact him online or give him a call at 888-535-3686 today.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Mr. Lento represents students and others in disciplinary cases and other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Mr. Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he has sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address school-related issues and concerns anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact our offices today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.