Alleged Victim Lashes Out at School After Title IX Investigation Clears Ex-Boyfriend and Star Running Back

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 05, 2019 | 0 Comments

After a Title IX investigation cleared him of wrongdoing, the ex-girlfriend of an Oklahoma running back lashed out at the school on Twitter for not taking her claims seriously. The episode is another instance of the vague and disturbing scope of Title IX, dating violence, and sexual harassment on campus.

Title IX Investigation Clears Oklahoma Running Back

In May 2019, a female student at Oklahoma University filed a Title IX complaint against Kennedy Brooks, a star running back on the school's nationally-ranked football team. In the complaint, she claimed that Brooks was physically abusive during their dating relationship, which lasted from June 2018 into March 2019.

Some of the things she recounted in her complaint included:

  • Pictures of bruises allegedly left by Brooks. In a text message to the girl, Brooks apparently said, “I should not have to put my hands on you to move.”
  • Brooks letting himself into her apartment after they had broken up, using a key that she didn't know he had.
  • Brooks allegedly cheating on her for someone who was still in high school.

She did not report any of these incidents to the police and had initially been uneasy with reporting them to OU's Title IX office because of the effect it would have on Brooks' career.

When she did file the complaint, Title IX policy required that Brooks be suspended from the football team's summer activities. On July 9, 2019, the Title IX investigation cleared Brooks of wrongdoing. It did, however, reschedule several of his classes so he wouldn't be in the same classes as the girl who'd made the complaint.

Complainant Lashes Out on Twitter

After the Title IX investigation concluded, the complainant lashed out on Twitter for what she saw was a miscarriage of justice. Standing by her story that she'd been “manipulated and abused both mentally and physically,” she claimed that the school had found in Brooks' favor because he was on the football team.

Sexual Harassment and Dating Violence

Even assuming that everything the complainant said is true, the ordeal raises some important questions about where Title IX ends.

Abusive relationships are serious problems, and domestic violence laws provide a legal avenue for victims to get restraining orders and for abusers to potentially even face criminal charges.

But for allegations of dating violence that happen on a college campus, Title IX can require the school to step in and handle the situation whenever it impacts a student's educational experience. As soon as it impacts a student's education, it becomes the “sexual misconduct” that amounts to the “sex discrimination” that Title IX forbids.

In this case, and again assuming that everything the complainant said is true – something that the Title IX office did not seem to do – she seems to have been in a bad relationship. But what does that entitle her to and what penalties should Kennedy Brooks face? From her Twitter tirade, she seems to think that he should be expelled. Clearly, separating them by rescheduling his classes didn't suffice.

If that's the penalty she feels entitled to for being “manipulated and abused both mentally and physically,” we should really be bothered by how far Title IX has come.

Joseph D. Lento: Title IX Defense

Joseph D. Lento is a Title IX defense lawyer and a national Title IX adviserContact him online or call him at (888) 535-3686.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide, and he can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact Us Today!


If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.