Blog

AI and the Ph.D. Dissertation: What to Know if You’re Accused

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Sep 18, 2023 | 0 Comments

Your doctoral dissertation is the crowning achievement of your grad school career: After years of courses and qualifying exams, lab or field work, teaching, conferences, and the deepest possible dive into a sea of secondary literature, you're ready to establish your place in the field with an original contribution to the scholarship. You've come too far to be derailed by allegations that your dissertation is the product of artificial intelligence.

AI and the Dissertation

New AI systems like ChatGPT, Jasper, Bard, Bing, and others promise to make research and writing projects of all kinds faster and easier. Grad students working on their dissertations might prompt an AI platform to perform basic research tasks, compile and interpret data, generate outlines, or even write all or parts of the chapters.

At the most high-pressure, high-stakes point in the graduate school process, AI assistance is tempting. A good dissertation will launch you professionally by providing the material for some of your first publications and setting the agenda for your post-doctoral career. A failed dissertation, conversely, is almost too awful to contemplate: All those years living on student wages, focused on a single purpose—years you didn't spend building a career, earning grown-up money, and starting a 401k.

AI could make dissertation writing easier for stressed-out grad students with much to gain and much to lose. (Whether it makes the product better is debated.) It could also, in some cases, defeat the whole purpose of the dissertation, which is original scholarship. No wonder university faculty and administrators are looking for it everywhere.

Accused of Using AI on the Dissertation

If you've been accused of using AI on your dissertation, you've got another project ahead of you: Getting a clear picture of the allegations and squaring them against your university's AI-use policies.

First, don't rely on fraught discussions in your advisor's office for your information. Instead, insist on a formal, written charge specifying how, in its understanding, you used AI for your dissertation. Is it alleging that you relied on a generative AI program for:

  • Research?
  • Analysis?
  • Outlining?
  • Citation generation?
  • Writing?

For each and any of these, the school also needs to identify the extent of the AI usage, in its opinion.

Evaluate these charges against your process on the dissertation. Locate and organize the evidence that disproves these charges, including notes and drafts. Ask the school to share the evidence it's using as a basis for the charge.

Next, it's the school's job to demonstrate that the specific AI uses it's alleging are in violation of codified school policy. Review the university's Code of Conduct to see if the uses you're accused of are in fact prohibited: AI is evolving so rapidly that such policies are often incomplete, inconsistent, and full of gaps.

Defending Yourself Against the Allegations

A successful case against you for violating your university's AI-use policy could be devastating, given how much you've invested to get to the dissertation stage and how much you've given up. Don't try to handle your defense on your own.

The Student Defense Team at the Lento Law Firm can help. They've worked with hundreds of students accused of a range of academic misconduct over the years, and will know how to help you reach the most favorable possible outcome. Contact the Lento team before responding to any allegations for advice and guidance by calling us at 888.535.3686 or visiting us online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento passionately fights for the futures of his clients nationwide. Attorney Lento and his team represent students and others in disciplinary cases and various other proceedings at colleges and universities across the United States. Attorney Lento has helped countless students, professors, and others in academia at more than a thousand colleges and universities across the United States, and when necessary, he and his team have sought justice on behalf of clients in courts across the nation. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and well-being. In various capacities, the Lento Law FIrm Team can help you or your student address any school-related issue or concern anywhere in the United States.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Comments have been disabled.

Contact Us Today!

If you, or your student, are facing any kind of disciplinary action, or other negative academic sanction, and are having feelings of uncertainty and anxiety for what the future may hold, contact the Lento Law Firm today, and let us help secure your academic career.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu